Compiled by Tom Drummond
North Seattle Community College
2001
| I have collected here, without examples or detailed explanations,
a collection of practices that constitute
excellence in college teaching. These elements represent the broad range
of effective actions teachers take, and requisite conditions teachers
establish, to facilitate learning. I have tried to make this listing intentionally
brief and scannable to serve more as a reference to the scope of excellent
teaching techniques than as a source of enlightenment. For information
on items that are unfamiliar, either post an email or refer to the citations.
Recognizing that teaching is both art and science, I advance this list of dimensions of excellence as a starting point for discussions about the performances we as teachers strive for and may help each other obtain. While the skills of teaching are widely researched and described, they are rarely rewarded, mostly, I think, because we don't share this common language about best practices. Instead of directly addressing learning to teach well, we often erroneously assume new teachers know how to teach because they used to be students. Becoming an excellent college teacher is a continuing life-long professional challenge, the dimensions of which often go unrecognized. In the general mind, doctors and lawyers are professionals, teachers are not. I believe we could change our semi-professional status if we could agree upon a list of Best Practices such as this one and help each other achieve them. It would help us achieve three goals:
If faculty could ever come to agree upon upon a performance list such as this one, our institutions could marshall the resources to accelerate its attainment, clarify the objectives for acquiring tenure, and offer salary rewards for an individual's continued reflective review of teaching practice. The Best Practices chosen here focus on those aspects of classroom teaching competence that are visible to oneself and to others and thus become useful for formative evaluation. When components of excellence can be defined in language that details teaching actions that are confirmable performances, that is, neither minutely technical nor remotely abstract, we could investigate those actions in practice, either collboratively or individually. For if a component can be self-perceived near the time it occurs, it can be modified or strengthened. That's how professionals, who must engage themselves in reflective practice, get better. In this spirit I offer a list of what I have struggled to learn to do in my 20+ years of college teaching about teaching. Even though classrooms vary in content and goals, I believe this core set of Best Practices does apply to most adult education environments, in both vocational and academic areas, albeit in differing degrees. It is my attempt to specify which of the myriad things and relations in teaching deserve close study. I have endeavored to learn to do each of these things in my college teaching. Have your colleagues? Have you? I have organized them under twelve headings. (When I have used them for tenure qualification, the candidate was required to set an objective under each goal area.)
|
| At times information must be transmitted orally to a passive listening audience. But research has
shown that after 10 to 20 minutes of continuous lecture, assimilation
falls off rapidly. If the teacher must rely on the oral presentation of
material, these techniques enhance learner retention.
Lecture/Rhetorical Questioning (1) Surveys with Exemplifier (2) Turn To Your Partner And... (3) Halting Time (4) Explication de Texte (5) Guided Lecture (6) Immediate Mastery Quiz (7) Story Telling (8) |
| Awareness of complexity and enhanced understanding result
when learners discuss the meaning of events with each other. But to be
successful, groups need a common experience to draw them into participation,
establish a personal connection with the content, and a provide a shared
referent from which to exemplify their ideas. There are many kinds of
triggers, but all are designed to precede group discussion. Participants,
therefore, become connected with both a concrete example of the content
and each other.
Short Readings First Person Experience Individual Task With Review Self-assessment Questionaires Total Group Response: Human Graph (9) Case Studies (10) (11) Visual Studies Role Play |
| What does it mean to think? Some people would like to be able
to think better, or, more usually, want other people's thinking to improve.
But research shows that everyone is capable of thinking. The problem is
to stop teachers from precluding the chance for it to happen. The right
kind of questions open the door to student's participation. The right
questions focus the learner's attention upon applying their current understanding
to the content or problem. The right questions are discoverable, that
is, have follow-up avenues that a teacher can follow to lead a student
to find an adequate answer using resources available (Socratic). Each
success on one of these problems is a lesson to the learner that he or
she knows how to think. (And each failure, a lesson in the opposite.)
Note that none of these tutorial questions asks for recall of facts or
information (didactic questions).
Discoverable Tutorial Questions
Wait Time (12) |
| When a learner contributes to the discussion or asks a question,
taking the initiative to learn, what is the best way to respond?
To facilitate self-discovery and self-appropriated learning, effective
teachers respond without changing the topic to share their own information
or perspective from a posture of mutual respect, without domination. These
three reflective responses, when used in sequence, constitute a responding
convention, a standard way to develop habits of talking that release
the potentialities of the learner and promote mutually significant sharing
by both the teacher and the learner. Used in this order they sequence
the amount of teacher control, starting with the lightest level.
Paraphrase Parallel Personal Comment Leading Query On Learner's Topic |
| All teaching moves learners into areas of risk and incompetence.
So often the job of a teacher is to find nascent deftness when it is easier
to notice the maladroit. The methods chosen to administer those positives,
however, send messages about what is important to achieve. Are learners
supposed to work toward external approval...... or their own intrinsic
betterment? Are grades the true reward......... or are learners supposed
to learn to enjoy the quest itself? Teachers answer these questions through
the manner in which they support improvement.
The best rewards are not contrived, foster personal reflection and independence, and actually work, that is, learners maintain new abilities or do better. Effective teachers support emerging initiative, cooperation and perseverance with well-timed positives in these forms: Avoid Praise (13)
Description
Narration
Self-Talk
Nonverbal
Personal Feelings
Intrinsically-Phrased Reward Statements
|
| All research on people, and on their brains, shows we learn
by doing. Learning is a constructing process. Here are the choices available
in the literature on teaching. The problem lies selecting the type of
activity to match the purpose the teacher has in mind.
Construction Spiral (14) Round Brainstorm Writing in Class (15) Concept Models Simulations and Games (16) Peer Teaching (17)
Examinations (18) |
| One form of active learning deserves special attention because
it overtly places the learners as workers, demands that each process beliefs
and construct expression with co-workers, and forces the achievement of
a group goal. That interdependence affects three broad and interrelated
outcomes: effort exerted to achieve, quality of relationships among participants,
and psycho-social adjustment. Ninety years of research and 600 studies
show cooperative learning tasks that have clear goals and performance
measures result in more higher-level reasoning, more frequent generation
of new ideas and solutions, and greater transfer of what is learned within
one one situation to another. Cooperative
learning groups embrace five key elements: positive interdependence,
individual accountability, group processing, social skills, and face-to-face
interaction. Typically three to five learners work in heterogeneous groups. All cooperative designs have
specific objectives, performance criteria and reward systems. In order
for them to be successful, teachers must expect to spend time building
cooperative skills and enforcing group self-assessment
of them. (19) Team Member Teaching (20) Team Effectiveness Design (21) Student Teams-Achievement Divisions (22) Performance Judging Design (23) Clarifying Attitudes Design (24) Poster Sessions |
| A formidable obstacle every teacher faces is how to analyze
the content of a course, predetermine the outcomes desired, and communicate
the necessary performance expectations to the learners in a detailed,
congruous syllabus that logically connects goals to the measures for grades.
That is, the objectives follow from the goals, the requirements are demonstrations
of performance of those objectives, and the evaluation methods reflect
attainment of the objectives to measurable criteria. This is rarely simple.
At times teachers need their own cooperative learning groups in order
to solve the myriad problems in coordinating course goals, uncovering
the traditional discontinuities between goals and grading, and achieving
assessment clarity. These are the basic criteria for
the task:
Goals Stated as Outcomes, Not Processes (25) Objectives are Performances (26) Requirements are Detailed in Writing Grades are Referenced to Criteria (27) |
| As a paragon of personal development, a teacher faces interpersonal
challenges in every action he or she takes to engage, facilitate, catalyze,
and give life to the opportunity to learn. Great teachers teach by example.
It is the authentic life that instructs. These attitudinal qualities
of being connected to learning in delight, illumination, and even rapture
have been described in many ways, but none clearer perhaps than by Carl
Rogers. (28) Openness to Experience in the Here
and Now Incorporation into Oneself of the Process of Change Unconditional Positive Regard for Others |
| The times when the teacher should correct performance are
often the most difficult as well as the most significant. It is easier
to identify errors and deficiencies in the actions of others than to communicate
them in a way that continues their willing engagement in correcting them.
Because people rarely produce actions that do not make sense to themselves
(they act intentionally), they naturally tend to become defensive, confused,
or ashamed when criticized or given advice. Yet individualized correction
is often the key to improved performance. An effective feedback procedure
should enable reflection and self-correction without fostering hostility
or defensiveness.
Double loop feedback (29) is a method of providing correctives in a way that maintains the learner's continued engagement in the process of acquiring competence and self confidence. It sequences the statements teacher's make by starting with least inferential and examining both the learner's performance and the evaluator's assumptions at each stage. In double loop learning an open-ended cycle is created where the teacher and the learner cooperatively examine both the learner's performance and the underlying perspectives the teacher brings to regard that performance. Optimal correction is possible when both parties responsibly work for error detection at each level of inference before proceeding to the next. In other words, get the facts right first; then work to agree upon what 'most people' would agree those facts to mean. As opposed to the natural tendency to think of judgements and opinions first, this procedure holds them in abeyance. Step 1. Objective Description of Physical Reality
Get agreement before proceding any further, for correcting errors may not be possible unless both parties agree to a common set of facts. Step 2. Culturally Accepted Meaning
Again, get agreement. Usually the learner will either justify or correct when the behavior is recognized as holding an accepted meaning. This level of inference is the same used by journalists and anthropologists to describe events and actions as viewed from a culturally specific viewpoint. That viewpoint, too, is also suspect and, to be fair, should be examined simultaneously----thus the term double loop. Step 3. Judgements and Personal Reality
|
| A large portion of teaching effectiveness involves setting
the stage. The task of getting everyone comfortable enough to learn comes
with the territory. Solve comfort issues first and the learning path is
smoother. Research shows that successful teachers spend 10% of classroom time optimizing the arrangement of the physical
setting as well as the psychological setting-a climate of collaborativeness,
supportiveness, openness, pleasure, and humanness. (30) Meet the Learner's Needs for Physical
Comfort and Accessibility Define Negotiable and Non-negotiable Areas Clarify the Instructor's Role Clarify the Learner's Role as Members of a Learning Community |
| Effective teachers offer ways for the learners to take an
active role, for at least a portion of the course, in diagnosing their learning needs, formulating learning goals,
identifying human and material resources for learning, choosing and implementing
appropriate strategies, and evaluating the outcomes, both internal and
external. (31) Involve Learners in Mutual Planning
The teacher, as leader, brings a more mature view of learner development over time and a thoughtful perspective on the long-term aims of education. The teacher has experienced the evolution of knowledge, skills and dispositions that lay beyond the learner's awareness. The teacher also brings his or her evolving understanding of the relation of the current study to what it means to be human. The content of each course is ultimately social; it relates to what it means to be fully enabled to be a life-long learner, acting for the welfare of self and society. From that maturity, the teacher brings a sympathetic understanding of individuals and processes that open communication and collaboration among all involved. Although many different activities can be created to enable learning, the teacher's initial role is to set conditions to draw forth the experience of each and every learner. One way, for example, is to create conditions for each learner to represent an aspect of their experience in this content area, share those representations with each other, and then compile together a summary of what the group knows currently. Together with initial questions that arise in the discussion, this ground-setting collaboration explicitly involves everyone, acknowledges each person's uniqueness, and sets the stage for participant responsibility for learning. When "what we know now" is compared to future possibilities -- by way of models of competence, needs of society or organizations, or ideals and values -- learners can begin to identify experiences that are more likely to provide a natural path for their development. Involve Learners in Cycles of Investigation and Representation Involve Learners in Formulating Their Inquiry
Involve Learners in Reflecting Upon Their Learning Learning to learn, to acquire the essential knowledge, skills and dispositions to participate in what John Dewey (33) calls the "reflective situation," is the essential aim of education. On the one hand, the learner is evolving an attitude of direct open non-defensive attitude of engagement in new areas of learning, an open-mindedness that welcomes suggestions and information, an absorption or engrossment that brings full attention to bear, and a responsibility to make clear choices and accept the results. These dispositions become a matter of knowledge as a result of repeated experiences of reflection. On the other hand, the teacher is evolving also. Each individual learner's method, or way of attack, upon a problem is present in the continuity of his or her experience, acquired habits and interests. Teachers study these ways in order to illuminate and bring openness in the opportunities and challenges he or she provides to the next learners. In this way, reflective processes enable both teachers and learners to become "experienced." In sum, the experience of the classroom itself is continually open to analysis. By involving learners in reflection, holding a mirror to what they do, the teacher both illuminates and engenders the dispositions to learn. |
R E F E R E N C E S
(1) R. Weaver and H. Cotrell, 'Using Interactive Images in the Lecture Hall.' Educational Horizons, 64:4, 180-185. back
(2) M. Hunter, Reinforcement (Tip Publications, El Segundo, California), 1983. back
(3) Weaver and Cotrell, 'Using Interactive Images in the Lecture Hall.' Educational Horizons, 64:4, 180-185. back
(4) Kenneth D. Moore, Classroom Teaching Skills: A Primer (Random House, New York) 1989. back
(5) Peter J. Frederick, 'Student Involvement: Active Learning in Large Classes.' In Teaching Large Classes Well, Edited by M.G. Weimer. New Directions for Teaching and Learning No. 32 (Jossey-Bass, San Francisco) 1987. back
(6) Brenda Wright Kelly and Janis Holmes, 'The Guided Lecture Procedure.' Journal of Reading 22:602-604. back
(7) Robert J. Menges, 'Research on Teaching and Learning: The Relevant and the Redundant.' Review of Higher Education 11: 259-268. back
(8) Joseph Campbell, The Power of Myth. (Doubleday, New York, 1988), p. 3-39. back
(9) Robin Fogarty, Designs for Cooperative Interactions (Skylight Publishing, Inc., 1990), p 42. back
(10) Gordon E. Greenwood & Forrest W. Parkay, Case Studies for Teacher Decision Making (Random House, New York), 1989. back
(11) Rita Silverman & William M. Welty, 'Teaching With Cases.' Journal on Excellence in College Teaching, 1, 1990, p. 88-97. Contact the authors at silverma@pacevm.dac.pace.edu or welty@pacevm.dac.pace.edu
(12) M.B. Rowe, Teaching Science as Continuous Inquiry (McGraw Hill, New York), 1978. back
(13) Haim Ginott, Teacher and Child. (Macmillan, New York), 1971. back
(14) Rita Smilkstein, 'A Natural Teaching Method Based on Learning Theory' in Gamut: A Forum for Teachers and Learners (Seattle Community Colleges, Seattle, Washington), 1991. back
(15) K. Patricia Cross and Thomas A. Angelo, Classroom Assessment Techniques: A Handbook for Faculty, Second Edition. (Jossey-Bass Publishers, San Francisco, California), 1993. back
(16) Paul Cloke, 'Applied Rural Geography and Planning: A Simple Gaming Technique.' Journal of Geography in Higher Education 11(1): 35-45. back
(17) Charles C. Bonwell and James A. Eison, Active Learning: Creating Excitement in the Classroom. ASHE-ERIC Higher Education Report No.1. Washington, D.C.: The George Washington University, School of Education and Human Development. 1991. back
(18) Bonwell and Eison, Active Learning: Creating Excitement in the Classroom. ASHE-ERIC Higher Education Report No.1. Washington, D.C.: The George Washington University, School of Education and Human Development. 1991.p. 50-52. back
(19) David W. Johnson, Roger T. Johnson and Karl A. Smith, Cooperative Learning: Increasing College Faculty Instructional Productivity. ASHE-ERIC Higher Education Report No.4. Washington, D.C.: The George Washington University, School of Education and Human Development. 1991. back
(20) Robert E. Slavin, Cooperative Learning: Theory, Research, and Practice, Second Edition (Allyn & Bacon, Needham Heights, MA 02194-2310), 1995. back
(21) Jane Srygley Mouton and Robert R. Blake, Synergogy (Jossey-Bass Publishers, San Francisco, California), 1984, p. 22-54. back
(22) Robert E. Slavin, Cooperative Learning: Theory, Research, and Practice, Second Edition (Allyn & Bacon, Needham Heights, MA 02194-2310), 1995. back
(23) Mouton and Blake, Synergogy (Jossey-Bass Publishers, San Francisco, California), 1984, p. 74-91. back
(24) Mouton and Blake, Synergogy (Jossey-Bass Publishers, San Francisco, California), 1984, p. 92-111. back
(25) Robert F. Mager, Goal Analysis (David S. Lake Publishers, Belmont California), 1984. back
(26) Robert F. Mager, Goal Analysis (David S. Lake Publishers, Belmont California), 1984. back
(27) James O. Hammons and Janice Barnsley, 'Everything You Need to Know About Developing a Grading Plan for Your Course (Well, Almost)' in Journal on Excellence in College Teaching, Vol.3, 1993, 51-68. back
(28) Carl R. Rogers, The Freedom to Learn (Charles E Merrill Publishing Company, Columbus, Ohio) 1969, p. 102-127. back
(29) Chris Argyris, Reasoning, Learning, and Action. (Jossey-Bass Publishers, San Francisco, California), 1982, p. 181. back
(30) Malcolm S. Knowles and Associates, Androgogy in Action. (Jossey-Bass Publishers, San Francisco, California), 1984. back
(31) Malcolm S. Knowles and Associates, Androgogy in Action. (Jossey-Bass Publishers, San Francisco, California), 1984. back
(32) K. Patricia Cross and Thomas A. Angelo, Classroom Assessment Techniques: A Handbook for Faculty, Second Edition. (Jossey-Bass Publishers, San Francisco, California), 1993. back
(33) John Dewey, Democracy and Education (The Free Press, New York, New York), 1916, 1944. back
![]()
If you have additions, modifications, questions, or disputes with this listing, please post me.
Phone 206-528-4626 FAX 206-527-3715
tdrummon@sccd.ctc.edu