H. D. Fernández L'Hoeste
    Representing Rock
    Duke University
    Durham, NC
    5 April 1997

    Unmasking the Rite: Rock Nacional (and) Latin American Modernity

    Rock nacional, a variety of music intimately related to the political imagery of a nation, has evolved in the course of the last decades from being a mere anomaly, to becoming a fixture of the Latin American cultural scene. This essay deals with the consolidation of its initial offspring, Argentine rock, as a movement of rebellious social nature; as such, it serves as a primary example of the reification of the discourse of subcultural rebellion. Although it may be aptly called the forerunner of the Latin American rock movement, since it managed to consolidate itself as a protagonist of the music scene well in advance of other nationalities, Argentina's rock nacional has validated its presence by means of social dynamics which adopt the concert and the underground scene as alternatives for political representation in times of government repression.

    The starting point for my argument is the analysis of the trajectory of Argentina's rock nacional as an antiauthoritarian phenomenon. Unlike previous readings, which see it as a movement of political resistance, my reading proposes rock nacional as a rite, as a cultural practice which pretends to infringe the status quo but which in turn validates and controls it. Therefore, it is through the study of the movement's circumstances that I intend to identify, in a concrete fashion, those aspects which support the ritualization of the cultural practice.

    My argument is based on the work of cultural anthropologist Néstor García Canclini in Hybrid Cultures (1995), who, embracing Bourdieuan notions, adopts the idea of the ritual and employs it to examine the role of the avant-garde. According to Bourdieu, the ritual wishes, aside from promoting the following of a proper behavior, to incorporate certain transgressions by limiting them. The rite seeks to give a direction to the world; hence, its great contribution, once the established order has been validated, is that of controlling any risk of change. According to Canclini, the rite is born from a failed attempt, due to the failure of the gesture of artistic rupture of the avant-garde; having failed to consolidate itself as act, the gesture engenders the rite. Canclini also suggests another possibility, an alternative understanding, where, by means of the rite, the forbidden order- a norm yet unaccepted by society--is validated. To him, the rite is, above all, a denied transgression, which may be classified in terms of ingress and egress. In other words, it deals as much with who may enter, as with how and who may exit. Whereas the rite of ingress defines how anyone may come to occupy a role--a civil condition, a social class, an economic standing--the rite of egress, with its exacerbated discontinuity, its reiterated pretense of disruption which is, in itself, continuous, has as its object to limit--to render useless--any proposal of change.

    To my knowledge, the most interesting aspect of rock nacional is its capability for reinvention, constantly adapting itself to the changing conditions of Argentine reality. To preserve its effect, the movement develops peculiar dynamics, based on practices which appear to exert, despite bearing the support of the traditional structures of power, an uncertain degree of independence with respect to the dictates of the commercial market. Following this order, its protagonists customarily renounce easy accomplishment, abandoning their bands as soon as they achieve success and pretending to flaunt a veiled criticism of the establishment, in a manner such that their following may easily identify with their message. The movement, of ample musical trajectory, survives thanks to the continuous creation of spaces which, in a hypothetical fashion, allow a communication beyond the state's intervention. This repeated negotiation of the space of resistance confers rock, notwithstanding its professed apoliticism, a considerable presence in the political scene.

    Availing myself of the delineation of a series of traits, my object is to question the understanding of rock nacional as a phenomenon of opportunistic or accidental nature and to ascertain that its basis, aside from bearing commercial affinity, is that of a grass-roots movement which pretends to disdain economic success. The phenomenon sells, but commercial success never appears to figure among its priorities. Sales are, if they may be understood in such a fashion, a by-product of its condition of masses.
    As a social and cultural practice, rock nacional depends on three basic circumstances, characterized by the instauration of experiences of spatial nature. Initially, there is the gestation of public performance as a primary link of communication, accompanied by an efficient capability of distinction--in other words, the ability to conceive and consolidate repeatedly an opposing front. Next, there is the transition to the underground scene, accompanied by a classic dynamics of rupture--i. e., the unforeseen collapse of the most popular bands. Finally, as a result of commercial assimilation, there is the return to musical extravagance as a symptom of oppositional survival.

    According to Alfredo Beltrán Fuentes, rock nacional is born in 1967 (La ideología antiautoritaria 46). Starting on this date, the music is popularized through concerts, familiarizing the public with the musical repertoire prior to any recording. The rise of the concert as a massive spectacle, more than a fortuitous event, is a necessity. The music, which just begins to be heard in the streets, is played in cafes, parks, and small theaters. The music-loving public becomes divided into mersas, those belonging to the working or lower middle class, and caqueros, the descendants of the well-to-do families of Barrio Norte; among these two groups, the former identified themselves with rock sung in Spanish, hence turning live performances into authentic channels of communication with the audience. In other words, the bourgeoisie--the segment with the greatest buying power -consumed another type of music: the one produced by the recording houses, of a commercial kind. Meanwhile, just one recording label took notice of the music of autochthonous quality, supporting progressive instrumentation, the sponsor of rock in Spanish. From that instant on, the movement's ascent to stardom is marked by its ability to situate itself steadily in the role of cultural occurrence of transgressive spirit, framing others as hypocrites. At that point, the artistic proposals fluctuate between the imitations of American and British rock, with lyrics in English, alien and shamelessly commercial, and the Spanish version, with customary pacifism, repeated disinterest in politics, and the advocation for a more authentic, less estranged way of life. In this way, rock in Spanish is, since its inception, linked to an uncommercial, utopian proposition.

    By favoring the concert as a massive communicative experience, rock manages to privatize a sphere of public domain; adopting it as its preferred space, it manages to achieve legitimacy. During an entire decade, the live concert serves as the primary link between the musicians and the public; the statistics confirm this, since they delineate a clear progress in terms of spectators. In the spring of 1969, the Pinap Festival of Beat & Pop Music is celebrated, giving way to a continuous string of performances. In 1971, Pelo, the pioneer magazine dedicated exclusively to the coverage of rock, organizes B. A. Rock I, with an audience of thirty thousand; the following versions of the event take place in 1971, 1972, and 1982. In November 1971, B. A. Rock II has an audience of nearly fifty thousand spectators. The mandatory sites of celebration comprise the entire extent of the capital district: the municipal race track, the Luna Park, the Centenario park, the fountains at Ezeiza, Obras Sanitarias, the Vélez Sarsfield arena, and the now gone Río de la Plata municipal amphitheater.

    After the faint demise of the English-speaking tendency, the strategy of distinction is once again embraced to differentiate the acoustic trend, which boasting a greater sensibility, argues for the superiority of their lyrics and the purity of their sound, from the electric one, which contends its technical superiority as a result of the incorporation of synthesizers and other technological advances. Years later, with the advent of disco, a genre that clashes openly with the national style--given, up to that point, to the stridence of symphonic rock--the tactic is repeated in order to uphold new musical preferences.

    Starting in 1972, rock nacional is once again broadcast through the airwaves, accompanied by an increase in the sociopolitical content of the lyrics and the swift appearance of key personalities for the consolidation of the movement. The previous phase, although critical of the system, seldom alluded directly to the harsh conditions of Argentine reality. Still, till that very year, police action, which repeatedly harassed the audience in concerts, becomes a chief target. It is unfitting that at this point, the movement, claiming to be antiauthoritarian, openly boasted of its apoliticism. That such contradiction remains unquestioned clearly indicates the musicians' care at the time of manufacturing a repute within the artistic scene; their ideological incongruity is never contested. Violence, up to this moment absent from presentations, begins to surface in concerts. Fights among the audience increase, and billboards and seats are destroyed; vandalism becomes rampant. The movement, with its popularity in ascent, attempts to integrate the most repressed sectors of society. Since social inequality is evident, the public is skeptical and rejects the mythical notion of a world of love and peace proposed by the artists, expressing its frustration with barbarism. Amidst the regnant social friction, some of the disadvantages and limitations of the concerts as vehicles for the masses become palpable. In time, the need for a new space grows obvious; a site where, despite the omnipresence of the government's repressive apparatus, a certain degree of representative reliability is possible.

    From 1972 to 1975, the chain of concerts swells substantially. In 1972, Aníbal Unset films the third B.A. Rock festival, producing the first motion picture of Argentine rock: Rock hasta que se ponga el sol. In this way, rock reaches the screens, platforms of access to the bourgeoisie. The climax is Sui Generis's farewell recital, on September 1975, before a public of thirty six thousand. The event is covered by the press and filmed for a second motion picture, Adiós Sui Géneris. Ironically, despite their criticism of the media and communication technology, the duo disregards how its great success relies, to a considerable degree, on such structures of power.

    After the 1976 coup, the prevailing atmosphere in live preformances suffers great deterioration. Although it does not exhibit a posture as committed as that of other musicians, a great deal of the material produced is censored, hence validating its protagonism and inviting the public to relate the movement with a message of resistance. The situation is appropriate; having disdained open confrontation, the musicians manage to avoid the state's persecution, and retain the air of an antiauthoritarian demeanor. Ideological ambiguity, a constant trait of the movement, is beneficial, for it pretends to challenge the system without making concessions. In 1976 and 1977 the number of concerts grows rapidly; Luna Park is filled up to twice a month. This rhythm, hard to maintain with such a limited following, exhausts the audience; the concluding performances are barely profitable.

    Towards the end of the seventies, the live performance, although it does not retain relevance, still serves as a chief mechanism for communication. Serú Girán, the band nicknamed the Argentine Beatles, celebrate an impressive appearance before an audience of sixty thousand at La Rural. To the chant of "Se va a acabar/ Se va a acabar/ La dictadura militar," the crowds serve as unwary accomplices. With the arrival of new musical types, of a more belligerent disposition, the decline of the spectacle becomes alarming. On July 17, 1981, during a presentation by Los Violadores--the first Argentine punks--the police intrude, interrupt the concert, and arrest people; other groups-- such as Stuka--are accused of making music against the motherland.

    With the arrival of the "Dirty War," repression is manifest. The possibility of massive rituals is ruled out and it becomes necessary to generate an exclusiveness where, despite not attracting a great mass, the privatization of public space is rendered possible. The sensible alternative is the underground scene, that flourishes at an exorbitant rate, and serves as a sanctuary for the Buenos Aires bohemia. These places, which play a crucial role, are seen as trustworthy alternatives of communication; their acceptance signals the beginning of change. Although concerts continue--at a lesser rate--supported by entrepreneurs like Daniel Grinbank, an underground bar does not require substantial investment, therefore facilitating the incorporation of new bands to the movement.

    At this point, one of the key features of the movement's upbeat dynamics is patent. Despite sales, the desire to no transar--to disregard the values of a consumerist society, to not give in--evidences a trait that always distinguishes Argentine rock: the continuous breakup of groups at the climax of their popularity. In 1972, forecasting this practice, the three most important groups of the movement--Los Gatos, Almendra, and Manal--split suddenly. This habit, of an untimely naïve nature, fosters the promotion of a rebellious image, leading the fans to believe. Charly García, who does not appear as a solo artist until the early eighties, and Luis Alberto Spinetta are its main exponents. In the case of García, he goes through three groups--all successful ones--Sui Géneris, La Máquina de Hacer Pájaros, and Serú Girán, prior to recording independently. In each case, he decides to terminate the experience as the group goes through its best moment, consequently favoring sporadic reëncounters. In the case of Spinetta, a living myth of Argentine rock, who starts his career with Almendra, one of the first bands, experiences follow with Pescado Rabioso, Invisible, Banda Spinetta, and Spinetta Jade. According to Canclini, such a discontinuous nature, proper of the rite of egress, maximizes the aesthetic value through ceaseless renovation and characterizes the movement beyond its turning point, the Falklands/Malvinas affair, persisting onto the present decade while accentuating and deliberately marking its discourse of resistance.

    The eighties mark the beginning of a shift towards a more relaxed position. Such a change is the result, in part, of the growing erosion of civil liberties within Argentine society. Through the decade, rock validates itself definitively as a movement of political resistance. At the same time, it develops alliances with other media and musicians, in order to fortify its standing before society. Towards the end, once the weariness of the concert as a formula for reaching out to the public is evident, it chooses to hide in the underground, in a more intimate and manageable nature.

    With the shift, serious renewal takes place. The open performances continue, surely, but they exhibit a more grandiose style, very professional, in the spirit of costly super productions; among many others, the Encuentro Nacional de Música Contemporánea and Primarock at Eseiza take place. After the war, the market integrates the bourgeoisie, an old admirer of English music, and the resistance to concerts increases considerably. In truth, the public performance becomes massive, anonymous, and impersonal, and rapidly loses priority. The bars and cafes, on the other hand, spurred by their transgressive façade, become the new site for mediation, where a more relaxed communion is established.

    The latest phase of rock nacional, the current one, is marked by economic success and commercial assimilation. With democracy, the assumption of an antiauthoritarian posture becomes less plausible, given the fact that the movement belongs to the officially sponsored culture. Strategies oscillate between marginality and sheer extravagance; in this period, there is a bit of everything. Despite whatever perspective is adopted, the movement's capacity to create discursive and narrative spaces is startling. Given the popularity resultant from the prohibition of English music during the Falkland/Malvinas conflict, traces of consumerism become apparent. Once direct competition has disappeared, the phenomenon reveals itself less utopian and more commercial.

    The arrival of democracy takes strength from the movement and forces it to conform. Gradually, new channels for interpellating the public are visible and the singularity of rock as the voice of the youth is finished. Once the national ogre appears weakened, rock nacional crosses borders and enhances its horizons, frequenting locations where its argentinidad is less effective. In the present decade, in order to survive, to preserve its financial and cultural viability, the themes become more generic, attenuating their localism. Given the extension of the market, a context which surpasses the Argentine nation becomes mandatory. The music is composed, not only with the locals in mind, but also taking into consideration the rest of the subcontinent. The market is redrawn, identifying the main urban areas as targets and exploring a wider thematic array. México City, Santiago, Bogotá, Lima, and Caracas begin to take part in the Argentine musical project. In the short term, this change dilutes energy; in the long one, it provides a wider, more stable coverage.

    In 1989, in a maneuver that manages to situate them as champions of democracy, the Mexican tours of Soda Stéreo and Charly García collaborate with Aztec rock, which, having insisted in English as a antiauthoritarian resource against the excesses of the ruling party, has become beleaguered. Mexican New Wave, an extremely vibrant portion of contemporary Latin American rock, benefits enormously from the southern invasion, in a fashion akin to that of British invasions in the U.S. (Morales 13). Suddenly, English disappears and bands known as Dangerous Rhythms and Three Souls in my Mind adopt Spanish names. With the acceptance of rock in Spanish, sponsored by Argentines and Spaniards, new bands such as Botellita de Jerez, La Maldita Vecindad, La Lupita, La Castañeda, and Café Tacuba become fixtures of the music scene. Once it becomes popular, the movement loses privilege, inspiring similar experiences in other countries.

    At present time, rock nacional has lost the transcendence it once sustained as an experience of social interpellation and as a phenomenon contributing to the formation of a national identity. Once it is incorporated to official culture, its influence decreases substantially. Although it becomes clear that it was not the result of a fortuitous practice and that it grew thanks to the support of favorable social dynamics, forged upon public performances and closed scenarios, the future of a movement that pretended to disdain financial success remains unclear. García, one of its more solid exponents and intuitive guides, has returned to a very abstract and uncommercial format, extremely hard to digest. His strategy seems to be that of embracing eccentricity in order to reach the top of the charts.

    Once it is widespread, the movement lacks a clear destination. The absence of a relation similar to that of the concerts during the years of the dictatorship and the underground stage during the early days of democracy, subtracts effectiveness to its presence. For the present generation, breakups and reëncounters lack any sense of appeal. Failing to consolidate an oppositional role, rock nacional appears diminished. New technology, satellite communication, the transnationalization of the music market, and the great consortiums of show biz seem to merge and confabulate, rendering difficult any improvisation of an efficient discursive space. Only when new channels of participation become clear, will it be possible to judge clearly the importance of this phenomenon beyond the borders of the Argentine nation.



    Bibliography

    Alabarces, Pablo. Entre gatos y violadores. El rock nacional en la cultura argentina. Buenos Aires: Ediciones Colihue, 1993.
    Beltrán Fuentes, Alfredo. La ideología antiautoritaria del rock nacional. Buenos Aires: Centro Editor de América Latina, 1989.
    Berti, Eduardo, ed. Rock Nacional: 57 canciones para tocar en guitarra con sus acordes y letras. Buenos Aires: Editora AC, 1993.
    Bourdieu, Pierre. "Champ du pouvoir, champ intellectuel et habitus de classe." Scolies, Cahiers de recherches de l'Ecole normale supérieure 1 (1971): 7-26.
    -----. Outline of a Theory of Practice. Trad. Richard Nice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1977.
    -----. La distinction, Critique sociale du jugement. Paris: Minuit, 1979.
    -----. Campo del poder y campo intelectual. Trad. Jorge Dotti. Buenos Aires: Folios Ediciones, 1983.
    -----. Distinction: a Social Critique of the Judgement of Taste Trad. Richard Nice. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1984.
    -----. "Le champ littéraire, Préables critiques et principes de méthode."Lendemains 9 (1984): 5-20.
    -----. An Introduction to the Work of Pierre Bourdieu: The Practice of Theory.Eds. Richard Harker, Cheleen Maher y Chris Wilkes. London: Macmillan, 1990.
    -----. Language and Symbolic Power. Ed. John B. Thompson. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1993.
    -----. The Field of Cultural Production: Essays on Art and Literature. Ed.Randal Johnson. New York: Columbia University Press, 1993.
    De la Puente, Eduardo y Dario Quintana. Rock! Antología analizada de la poesía rock argentina desde 1965. Buenos Aires: El Juglar Editorial, 1988.
    Fernández Bitar, Marcelo. "Concert Biz Blazing in Argentina." Billboard 27 February (1993): 42. INFOTRAC.
    -----. "Don't Cry for Argentina; The Rebounding Economy Encourages Independents and Rewards Local Talent." Billboard 18 December (1993): 104. INFOTRAC.
    -----. "Soda Singer Goes Solo with Sony Set." Billboard 19 March (1994): 44. INFOTRAC.
    -----. "Grinbank on a Roll as S.A.'s Top Promoter." Billboard 9 April (1994): 33. INFOTRAC.
    -----. "García's Back, with a Rock Opera." Billboard 17 September (1994): 42. INFOTRAC.
    -----. "EMI Issues Argentine Rock Retrospectives." Billboard 8 October (1994): 60. INFOTRAC.
    -----. "Argentina's Los Pericos Fly High." Billboard 5 November (1994): 47. INFOTRAC.
    -----. "A Boom Goes Bust." Billboard 10 December (1994): 58. INFOTRAC.
    -----. "Sony's Ratones to Rock with Stones." Billboard 21 January (1995):38. INFOTRAC.
    -----. "Páez's got 'Beat' on WB." Billboard 11 February (1995): 36. INFOTRAC.
    García Canclini, Néstor Las culturas populares en el capitalismo. México, D. F.: Nueva Imagen, 1982.
    -----. Políticas culturales en América Latina. México, D. F.: Grijalbo, 1987.
    -----. Culturas híbridas: estrategias para entrar y salir de la modernidad. México, D. F.: Grijalbo, 1990.
    -----. Consumidores y ciudadanos: Conflictos multiculturales de la globalización. México, D. F.: Grijalbo, 1995.
    Grinberg, Miguel. La música progresiva argentina: cómo vino la mano. Buenos Aires: Editorial Convergencia, 1977.
    Guerrero, Gloria. La historia del palo: diario del rock argentino 1981- 1994. Buenos Aires: Ediciones de la Urraca, 1994.
    Marzullo, Osvaldo y Pancho Muñoz. El rock en la Argentina: la historia y sus protagonistas. Buenos Aires: Editorial Galerna, 1986.
    Morales, Ed. "Rock is Dead and Living in Mexico."The Village Voice: Rock &Roll Quarterly Winter 1993: 13-19.
    Ramos, Laura y Cynthia Lejbowicz.Corazones en llamas: Historias del rock argentino en los '80. Buenos Aires: Clarín/Aguilar, 1991.
    Vila, Pablo. "Argentina's Rock Nacional: The Struggle for Meaning." LatinAmerican Music Review June (1989): 1-28.
    -----. "Rock nacional and dictatorship in Argentina." Popular Music May (1987): 129-148.
    -----. "Rock Nacional and Dictatorship in Argentina." Rockin' the Boat: Mass Music and Mass Movements. Ed. Reebee Garofalo.Boston: South End Press, 1992. 208-229.
    -----. "Tango, folklore y rock: Apuntes sobre música, política y sociedad en Argentina." Cahiers du Monde Hispanique et Luso-Brasilien 48 (1987): 81-93.
    -----. "Tango to Folk: Hegemony Construction and Popular Identities in Argentina." Studies in Latin American Popular Culture 10 (1991): 107-139.


    Last updated 06/24/97. Return to the main page.