HOME      CV      WRITINGS      MEDIA      CONTACT

---

Navigating Myst-y Landscapes: Killer Applications and Hybrid Criticism

Greg M. Smith
 
 

In Hop on Pop: The Pleasures and Politics of Popular Culture, edited by Henry Jenkins, Jane Shattuc, and Tara McPherson (Duke University Press, 2003)

Introduction

 

Convincing consumers to purchase expensive new technology usually requires a software application demonstrating the medium's distinctive capabilities. If these pieces of software, called "killer applications," can show that the new medium offers new pleasures, they can justify purchasing the new equipment, thus opening up previously untapped commercial markets for further development. An innovative software blockbuster such as Brøderbund's CD-ROM Myst not only sells CD-ROMs (over 2 million copies),[1] but it also sells consumers on the need for CD-ROM technology. (Snider 1996) It helps create a widely held understanding of what a CD-ROM is.
 

Killer applications are by definition shining examples of the "new."   Showing that a groundbreaking product is radically different from its predecessors is necessarily a part of creating a killer application. Popular hyperbole promises that "you've never seen anything like this before," or "youain't heard nothing yet" (as Al Jolson was widely reported as saying in The Jazz Singer, 1927's killer application which paved the way for widespread conversion to sound film). The lure of new ways of seeing and hearing helps create consumer demand, but this emphasis also hides the continuities between old and new paradigms of media use.
 

By heralding Myst as "one of those works that irrevocably changes the parameters of an artform,multimedia's equivalent of Don Quixote or Sgt. Pepper's," popular discourse necessarily emphasizes Myst's innovations over the ways it continues and extends earlier multimedia trends. (Davis 1994, 45) This emphasis on what makes Myst new can make it difficult to see clearly what Myst actually does. Rather than create a radically distinctive form of multimedia,Myst reworks characteristics of previous CD-ROMs combined with various techniques borrowed from other media. This essay in part traces how Myst reconfigures strategies borrowed from earlier media paradigms. Viewing Myst in terms of preexisting media helps us to see the blend of old and new that is necessary for a commercially successful killer application. Reconnecting Myst to other media helps us see more clearly what is distinctive about this CD-ROM.
 

Even if the software is in many ways revolutionary, our way of talking and thinking about the medium has not yet been revolutionized. The terms we use to describe the CD-ROM medium and the expectations we have regarding what a CD-ROM should do are a crucial part of the background against which we make sense of Myst. Discussions concerning Myst in the popular press and on the Internet are rooted in the utopian rhetoric surrounding virtual reality and hypermedia. Over and over the discussions about Myst refer to its "interactivity" and its "virtual reality," and these terms mystify as much as they enlighten about the game. What do these words mean specifically in relation to Myst?This paper investigates several common observations about Myst which circulate in public discourse and amplifies what these terms mean in relation to this particular CD-ROM.
 

A closer understanding of Myst is crucial for understanding our society's definition of multimedia's capabilities. Since such killer applications demonstrate a medium's capabilities so early in its history, they can powerfully shape our understanding of what the medium is and what it should do. The New York Times has acclaimed Myst as coming close to "the Holy Grail of multimedia developers:finding a way to immerse the viewer in a narrative but to let them shape it freely." (Sterngold 1995, B1) A killer application is important not only as a model for future development (e.g., Qin: Tomb of the Middle Kingdom, 9, Drowned God, Timelapse) but also as an particular definition of the goals of medium itself. The capabilities exploited by a killer application loom large in our conceptions of the pleasures offered by the medium. Better understanding the social network of meanings activated by Myst should help us understand our present and future conceptions of multimedia.
 

Nonlinear Narrative

Computer games found their first economically viable audience by positioning themselves as an outgrowth of arcade video games. A generation of players whose fine motor reflexes were honed using joysticks at arcades further developed those skills in their homes as they played Nintendo or Sega home versions of arcade games. Once the technology was domesticated, computer games found a ready-made audience by providing similar visceral pleasures of quick moves executed against the clock. Beginning with two-dimensional games such as Donkey Kong and Super Mario Bros., the computer game then called upon the detailed graphics information which could be provided by CD-ROMs to create simulated three-dimensional games. Based on the same principles of quick action, hand dexterity, and time pressures, CD-ROM games such as Doom offered the player the pleasures of racing through a maze of corridors while accumulating a staggering body count before dying.
 

In many ways Doom epitomizes the dominant paradigm for CD-ROM games. We the player play the part of the hero who has been sent to investigate a crisis. Our mission, we are told, is to find out what went wrong with interdimensional space travel between the moons of Mars. Once transported into the eerie landscape, we are suddenly besieged by a variety of lethal attackers, and we must fight our way through by blasting a swath through these marauders. Although Doom has a story, the story quickly loses narrative significance, leaving us only with the goal of staying alive. Doom has only one rule: "if it moves, shoot it."   The dominant paradigm of CD-ROM games (as embodied by Doom) offers the spectacular pleasures of nonstop violent action, supplying the player with sufficiently developed hand reflexes with graphic pictures and digital sound of their lethal triumphs. Such games provide an interactive version of the culturally devalued pleasures of wrestling, martial arts movies, and the splatter film.
 

Almost immediately Myst announces itself as a very different kind of game from the dominant paradigm. When we the Myst players arrive on MystIsland, we find an uninhabited virtual world of placid landscapes, strange equipment, and burned books. We learn of Sirrus and Achenar, two brothers, and their father Atrus, a man who creates fantastic worlds or "ages" by writing them into books. These books provide links which allow travelers to venture from one spectacularly realized age to another. However, the library of books has been virtually destroyed by fire, and Atrus leaves messages for us casting suspicion that one of his two sons is responsible for foul play. If we solve the puzzles which protect the few remaining books, we can use the books to travel among five other ages, urged on by Sirrus and Achenar (who are both trapped in books themselves and who accuse the other of evil via distorted Quicktime video). Collecting loose pages in the different ages enables us to unravel the mystery of what happened to Atrus and his two sons.
 

Some have called Myst's story "compelling" and "engaging," (Desmond et al. 1994; Grunin 1994) but most note how minimal the plot is. For example, PC Magazine says that, "If you like a neat plot with defined goals, you'll be disappointed [by Myst]." (Ulanoff 1994, 156) Given the enormous popularity of Myst, it is remarkable how little plot there is in Myst. We learn what happened before we arrived on MystIsland through some extraordinarily terse expository devices:the opening credit sequence, three brief video clips, and the unburned pages of several handwritten journals. After the initial exposition is over, we do not learn about any more significant plot events until the end of the game when we get the denouement. This is an astoundingly flat narrative structure:a setup of the situation and the resolution, separated by hours or even months of player activity without any payoff provided by new story information.
 

Experienced CD-ROM game players will recognize this structure from playing "shoot-em-ups" such as Doom. The brief exposition and denouement frame and provide a rationale for the primary game activity. Although Myst works hard to differentiate itself from the Doom paradigm, it calls upon a similar narrative framework for its action.
 

However,Myst structures its action without the urgency characteristic of most CD-ROM games. One of the most commented on features of Myst is its almost complete lack of time deadlines. MacWorld notes that "there's no time pressure to distract you, no arbitrary punishments put in your way."[2] (Levy 1995, 102) But time pressures and the threat of arbitrarily punishing characters are two of the primary driving forces in CD-ROM games. Without these local structures pushing the plot forward, Myst's narrative comes to a standstill.
 

This standstill differs from the plot structure in Doom because Doom incorporates norms from modern spectacle-oriented Hollywood product, as Angela Ndalianis argues. (in this volume) Low budget popular films such as Evil Dead II and big budget blockbusters such as Twister are now structured so that the narrative progress of the film comes to a halt while the film stages an action spectacle (explicit gore, expensive special-effects, etc.) intended to elicit a visceral reaction. Rather than the action-packed narrative stasis of the modern action-adventure spectacle or the deadline-driven progression of the classical Hollywood film, Myst chooses a time scheme more characteristic of art cinema narration, which is less dependent on deadlines to drive the plot. (Bordwell 1985, 205-233) After a brief taste of Raiders of the Lost Ark-style narration, the Myst player suddenly finds him/herself in L'Avventura. Like a protagonist in an episodic art film, the Myst player wanders through an ambiguous world without time pressures exerted by the narrative.
 

Myst is not so much a nonlinear narrative (as some commentators have described) (Miller 1994) as much as it is a linear narrative which stops and transforms into a game only to return to the narrative for ending closure. The destabilizing force in this narrative is not simply that Myst has four possible endings, nor is it that a player can visit the Channelwood, Stoneship, Mechanical, and Selenitic Ages in any order. The reason it doesn't matter in what order the player visits the different ages is because the narrative has been stilled. 
 

Of course there is some new narrative information offered along the way to the Myst player, but that information has more to do with gaining insights into characters than it does depicting new plot occurrences. Visiting Sirrus's and Achenar's rooms in various ages helps us understand their characters. Sirrus's rooms are plushly and lavishly decorated, and Achenar's rooms are filled with weapons, implements of torture, and poisons. After solving the puzzle in each age, we revisit MystIsland where we receive another Quicktime video message from Sirrus and Achenar, allowing us to examine their performances in detail. This information is useful in helping the player to decide which brother is guilty and which is innocent, but this information does not advance what we know about the storyline. Myst does not show us plot occurrences (formative events in their past, battles in the present) to help us decide between the two brothers. Instead, Myst transmits its narrative information (after the intense early exposition) through the art direction, not through character action. 
 

As the player traverses Myst's lushly detailed environments, his/her primary activity involves solving puzzles. Solving these puzzles provides local payoffs to the Myst player, which keeps him/her involved. The narrative framework not only provides a forward impetus to the player's activity but it also provides justification for the puzzles. Commentators have noted that "Myst's challenges aren't shoehorned in to the landscape. The puzzles, for the most part, are logically and integrally linked to place, time, and story. Instead of confronting you with brainteasers that have no more purpose than extending play time, Myst demands that you have a hands-on interactive experience manipulating the clocks, valves, machinery, and gadgets found in the game." (Lindstrom 1994, 86) Unlike many other games, Myst's story justifies the presence of the puzzles we players have to solve. Rather than seeming to be arbitrarily added as an obstacle for the player to overcome, the puzzles' existence makes sense in terms of the narrative:the books that link the various ages need to be protected from people who might use them for evil purposes. In this sense Myst plays by one of the rules of the well-made classical narrative form. Obstacles that protagonists have to overcome must not be thrown into the story arbitrarily to delay their progress toward the goals. Instead obstacles in classical narratives (and in Myst ages) must be justified in terms of who these particular characters are and what events have happened to them. In Myst the story, as brief as it is, underwrites the activity of puzzle solving and the fantastic construction of these worlds.
 

The game of puzzles and panoramas cannot be separated from the narrative framework, however. The narrative framework provides an overall trajectory for the player by setting up a large question to be answered:which one is guilty, Sirrus or Achenar?The framework energizes the player's search and buoys us with the hope that (eventually) the enigma will solved. The narrative construction maintains a classical sense that the hermeneutic code will eventually be unambiguously disclosed, and this long-delayed hope propels us through the CD-ROM. Without this narrative setup, the puzzles would provide less pleasure. In fact, after successfully completing the game, the player is told that he/she is free to do exactly what they've been doing:explore the various worlds of Myst. But few players do because the overall narrative goal has already been achieved. Without the promise of narrative closure, the spectacular views and intricate puzzles lose much of their appeal.
 

Myst has much at stake in trying to differentiate itself from the Doom conception of CD-ROM games. If this killer application can distance itself from the fast action and abundant violence of the Doom paradigm, it can open up new audiences whose reflexes have not been trained by arcade games. Rejecting time deadlines and relying on subtle art direction as a primary means of conveying narrative information help Myst position itself in opposition to the "shoot-em-up."   Classically justifying its puzzles in terms of the narrative differentiates Myst from games whose puzzles are merely arbitrary obstacles added to the landscape. But these strategies which distinguish Myst are supported by the same narrative structure used in Doom. A narrative standstill makes possible both the gory pleasures of Doom and the quieter pleasures of Myst.
 

Intuitive Immersion in Virtual Reality

 

"Real life is what happens between Myst."

- Myst player Arthur Siegel (Carroll 1994, 80)

 

However, the still images do rely upon some qualities media scholars discuss as giving a socially convincing sense of the real. Many have commented on the level of detail in Myst's 2500 images, stating that the intricacy of these 3D modeled images helps give them their virtual reality. This echoes Christian Metz's argument that the rich detail of the cinematic signifier helps us disavow the absence of the actual object being depicted. (1982, 61-74) Myst's seeming-real similarly depends on its level of detail, as Myst co-creator Rand Miller says:"A lot can be done with texture. . . . Like finding an interesting texture you can map into the tapestry on the wall, spending a little extra time to actually put the bumps on the tapestry, putting screws in things. These are the things you don't necessarily notice, but if they weren't there, would flag to your subconscious that this is fake." (Gillen 1994) Myst takes full advantage of the CD-ROMs capability to present lavishly detailed still images in its attempt to create images which seem "real," or even "hyperreal."[3]
 

Many have commented on Myst's soundtrack (a combination of New Age-ish music and digital sound effects), suggesting that it also bolsters the sense of virtual reality in a way reminscent of film sound. Bob Lindstrom in Compute!magazine calls attention to Myst's "brilliant digital samples with the realer-than-real impact that we normally associate with motion-picture audio." (1994, 87) Mary Ann Doane (1985) has argued that sound provides a sense of presence which is crucial to the cinema's sense of seeming-real, that sound reawakens our early childhood awareness of space (which is first defined by the audible, not the visual). Sound for Doane provides a sense of nearness which counterbalances the necessarily distant cinematic signifier,[4] and the crispness of digital sound (in CD-ROMs or present day Hollywood films) only increases this effect. Myst recognizes that "the ear builds a sense of embodiment as much as the eye," as the Village Voice puts it, and uses this CD capacity to lend its visuals a sense of intimate presence. (Davis 1994, 45)
 

A crucial aid to Myst's seeming-real is its seamless interface which does not call attention to the computer medium but encourages us to concentrate solely on the diegetic world it depicts. Unlike most software applications, Myst appears onscreen as a series of images with no computerized instrument panel or pulldown menus in sight (unless your mouse pointer wanders to the top of the iscreen to reveal a standard Windows-style menu). For most of the time the Myst player receivesrelatively few cues which remind you of the game's "computerness."[5] Lindstrom notes how Myst "almost entirely does away with the interface. . . . With no artificial computer layer between you and the game, Myst effectively lures you into its own reality and enhances its hands-on illusion of life." (1994, 87)
 

Myst's primary brilliance lies in the way it provides narrative justification for the very things that are most annoying about CD-ROMs. Compared to the utopian promises of the potential of hypermedia and virtual reality, CD-ROMs are quite humble objects. Instead of rising to the potential of tomorrow, CD-ROMs are often mired in the technology of today:slow access time, difficult installation procedures, animated images much fuzzier than the worst television. Myst ingeniously makes the medium's limitations part of the story it tells. For example, Quicktime video clips are of extraordinarily poor visual quality and are frequently presented in a small window occupying a fraction of the computer screen. Myst's creative solution is to locate these clips in books and small viewers in the various story ages. Myst even alludes to the difficulty most CD-ROM users have experienced when running too many programs in the background while trying to run a CD-ROM application with video clips in the foreground. Myst duplicates the erratic, interrupted quality of CD-ROMs under multiprocessing in the disjointed video messages from Sirrus and Achenar.[6]
 

Since animation in CD-ROMs tends to be considerably less fluid than media savvy audiences are accustomed to, Myst avoids relying on animation and justifies this in terms of the story. Either Sirrus's or Achenar's vandalism has assumedly caused the populations of these ages to be wiped out, resulting in a series of uninhabited landscapes which require minimal animation.
 

Then there is the issue of CD-ROMs slowness. Anyone used to channel surfing on cable will lfind waiting on the response time of most CD-ROMs to be agonizing. According to MacWorld, however, "Myst is the first CD-ROM game we've seen that doesn't constantly remind us how slow the medium is." (Beekman andBeekman 1994, 76) This has less to do with Myst's seek time than it does with the structure of the game. The lack of timed deadlines is a major factor here, but more subtly Myst emphasizes the necessity of waiting in order to complete the game successfully. You cannot simply get into the tree elevator on MystIsland, press the button, and have the elevator respond. You must wait for the steam boiler to build up pressure before the elevator will respond. Unlike timed games such as Super Mario Bros., Myst trains the player to wait (a handy skill in dealing with CD-ROMs).
 

Things take time in Myst. Like the real world, movement through Myst's (virtual) space involves real time, and much of the player's time is spent traveling through diegetic distance. A puzzle frequently will be located away from the corresponding book-link to another age, requiring that the player travel a significant distance from the solved puzzle to the linking book (for instance, after solving the puzzle in the clocktower, the player must "walk" to the other side of the island to go to the next age). Myst arranges its objects in such a way that the player must spend a great deal of time shuttling back and forth between locations.[7] In Channelwood, for instance, a player must navigate through a maze of water pipes, turning on multiple valves located across the island to enable the machinery to work properly. 
 

In contrast to the Doom player, much of the Myst player's time is spent tediously traversing the space. This reminds us that this space is recalcitrant to our desires, just as the real world is. Although we would like to be able to move instantly from one place to another, the real world requires time to walk through, fumble with keys, and unlock doors. Because Myst keeps us from moving through its spaces too quickly, it reminds us of the real world which also does not bend so easily to our desires.
 

And yet we are frequently reminded that the Myst worlds do not respond as the real world does. The Myst player must use somewhat nonCartesian tools to explore these virtual worlds. Clicking the mouse on a portion of the screen allows you to "move" left or right, up or down. However, directionality in Myst is not as straightforward as this would suggest. A click left in a particular location may shift you either 90 or 180 degrees left; clicking right is similarly unpredictable.[8] In a fairly distinctive location, there are enough overlapping spatial cues to keep your movements from becoming too confusing. In spaces with great redundancy (e.g., the network of very similar treehouses in the Channelwood age), this unpredictability can become quite confusing. Why are the Myst player's movements structured this way?In the real world we can control whether we're making a 90 or 180 degree turn. Why not let a click left always execute a 90 degree left turn in Myst?
 

Myst suggests that the new CD-ROM medium does not have quite the same fear of losing the spectator in space that the new medium of film had when it created the classical cinema's stylistic norms. Myst seems more concerned about losing the spectator narratively. It is designed so that only one clue is so absolutely crucial that if you miss it you cannot progress at all. The box even includes an actual paper brochure revealing this clue (concerning the tower rotation on MystIsland) just in case you miss it. This suggests that once the player understands the basic narrative trajectory, he/she can tolerate significant ambiguity of spatial cues without becoming disoriented. [9]Narrative trajectory seems more important here than consistency of movement.
 

Movement commands in Myst are structured so that you will go where you need to go, instead of being structured to maintain a clear spatial orientation. If you click left and turn 180 degrees, you can assume that there is nothing significant in the space you would have seen had you turned only 90 degrees. Myst will let you see what you need to know, editing out spatial perspectives which are not significant to the narrative or to solving the puzzles.[10]
 

The sense that the Myst player moves based on where his/her mind wants or needs to be (and not on a purely logical, Cartesian system of movement) recalls the argument that hypermedia is supposedly arranged to approximate the human mind more closely. According to this line of thinking, the mind functions not based primarily on formal binary logic but on nonlinear associations, links, intuitions. (Slatin, 158) We can move from one subject to another as long as these subjects are somehow mentally linked, regardless of whether that link makes purely logical sense. Myst takes this principle and maps it onto a virtual space, and the player's moves through this space are consistent with this popular model of mental functioning.[11] By allowing us to visit potentially significant spaces and preventing us from seeing insignificant spaces, Myst simulates the mental landscape of a player who intuits the significance of the various locations. Instead of duplicating most games's literal conception of a player capable of simulated physical movement in any direction, Myst positions the player in a world whose operating principles are both physical proximity and mental connection. The result is a compromise world that samples from both the real and the virtual. Myst (like the real world) denies us the freedom of moving at the speed of our intuitions, and yet it shapes our movements to simulate a limited sense of intuition.[12]
 

Jon Katz in Rolling Stone writes, "Myst's strange, mystical world rewards not the quick reflexes of Super Mario Bros. but creative reasoning. The more we guess, the more we guess right, and the more we guess right, the more our confidence builds. . . . The thrill is not in the story so much as in discovering that this technology can be mastered by intuition." (1994, 46) Myst activates the fantasy that many of us have: that we will be able to master our technology without resorting to manuals, that technology will so closely duplicate the workings of the human mind that we can use it based purely on intuition. The nonCartesian method of movement in Myst enables the player to interact with the virtual spaces in ways that feel more naturalistic.
 

Myst, therefore, gives the impression of immersion in an alternate reality through its simulation of the processes of intuition, its intricately detailed art direction, its atmospheric sound, and its narrative justification of the limitations of the CD-ROM medium.Immersion figures largely in discourses aboutMyst. "It will become your world," announces the Myst packaging.A woman allegedly wrote Brøderbund Software, Myst's publisher, that her children had to sleep in sleeping bags because she was too immersed in the game to do the laundry. The director of marketing at Brøderbund says that they receive online messages saying, "I've lost my job, I've lost my girlfriend.When is Myst 2 coming out?" (Steinberg 1994, A31; McGowan 1995)
 

Stories such as these are part of the Myst legend, which is initially puzzling because there is little in Myst which would seem to elicit traditional visual immersion:few moving images, few images of humans to identify with, a stagnant narrative. Immersion usually occurs when you're swept up in narrative progression, not when you're mired in digression.
 

The fact that Myst is widely acknowledged by its players to provoke immersion in the game/diegesis suggests that an alternative paradigm of immersion (or engagement) is at work in CD-ROMs.[13]The requirements for this form of immersion seem to include a narrative framework providing forward direction; a cohesive detailed virtual world which makes logical sense on its own terms; and the lack of an intrusive interface which might remind us of "computerness."  These three qualities characterize both Myst and the game which seems to be its antithesis: Doom. Doom supplies a narrative framework (as discussed earlier), and its atmospheric details and digital sound create a cohesive and detailed world with little visible interference from a computer interface. Within this paradigm of CD-ROM immersion there is considerable room for variation, andMyst's version of immersion is distinguished by its simulation of mental intuition (rather than the dominant paradigm's slavishly literal-minded understanding of the player as moving through a physical environment). Myst and Doom share certain fundamental requirements for CD-ROM immersion while offering very different experiences based on the qualities that shape their interactivity.

Interactivity

Although popular discourse seems to have given new technology a monopoly on the word "interactive," reader response theory has made the academy aware that all reading is interactive in some sense. The important question is, what kinds of interactions are promoted and discouraged in a reader's encounters with various kinds of texts? What does "interactivity" mean in different texts?
 

In Myst interactivity clearly refers to the fact that the player can control the order in which he/she visits the various ages instead of the CD-ROM dictating the order. This clearly differentiates the game from the form of interactivity proffered by Doom, in which the player must progress through an ordered sequence of numbered levels. But even more importantly, interactivity in Myst means that you can choose which portions of the space to attend to and manipulate.
 

Myst asks the player to conceptualize its virtual spaces in a distinctive manner. We are encouraged to treat almost everything in the space as being potentially significant to the narrative/game. Myst teaches us that we should "handle" (click on) every panel, every decoration, and every object in a room because each of these could provide information needed to solve the puzzle.This makes you aware of the possible significance of the smallest items in the space.
 

With few human figures and little spoken dialogue, Myst foregrounds its spaces as being the most important object of our attention. Our early experiences with Myst teach us to treat the space in this manner, just as neoformalist film criticism suggests that the initial moments of a film teach us how to watch and listen to this particular film. (Thompson 1988, 38-44, 89-95) We are initially placed on MystIsland with no overt instructions on what to do, no clear sense of what the object or goal of the game is. The lack of clear instructions on how to proceed is one of the innovations most frequently noted about this killer application. The discussions of this highly praised aspect of Myst need to be tempered with the acknowledgment that for most of the time one playsMyst, one knows exactly what the goal is and how to maneuver in the space. However, this initial (though temporary) lack of clear orientation is crucial to teaching us the importance of close attention to the space.The narrative standstill and the intricate detail of the images also encourage us to explore the landscapes carefully, as does the lack of a time deadline. A timed game such as Super Mario Bros. or an action-intensive game such as Doom do not promote perusing the scene;all the emphasis is on the figure's actions. In Myst we haltingly uncover the narrative and the unwritten rules of playing as we click on various objects, and along the way we discover the potential importance of the most negligible objects.
 

Myst encourages you to interact with all the objects, but it discourages purely random guessing since many clicks don't do anything at all. The game does provide intermittent reinforcement for our clicking behavior, however.Just because one clicked-on object doesn't do anything does not mean that another very similar object will not be the key to the puzzle (for instance, in the Stoneship Age most of the semicircular panels lining a hallway do nothing, except for one which is the gateway to the compass room). Myst encourages a continuous curiosity about the minutiae of its detailed spaces, shaping the quality of our interactions with the CD-ROM.
 

In addition to training us to watch its virtual spaces, Myst instructs us that close attention to sounds is just as important.Musical motifs cue you to whether or not a place is significant to the narrative/puzzle (e.g., intriguing music plays in the Myst tower only when a clue is available).[14]In some cases being able to remember and reconstruct a sequence of sounds in Myst is crucial to working the puzzle (sound memory is crucial in order to get to the Selenitic Age and to leave it).The crisp, overly near, omnipresent digital sounds we hear on our first visit to MystIsland prepare us to recognize the importance of sound in Myst problem solving.
 

So Myst foregrounds portions of the signifier which are generally relegated to the "background" in mainstream visual media.[15]In Doom, for example, players must pay much more attention to the lethal demons hurtling toward them than to the patterns on the wall. Myst restructures the way the reader/player encounters the CD-ROM text, similarly to the way hypertexts has been argued to restructure the hierarchy of traditional written texts.In a hypertext, items which play a secondary role on the conventional page (for instance, the footnote) can become prioritized, forming the basis for a reader's interactions. (Harpold 1991, 172) Myst also rearranges the normal hierarchy of dealing with visual media, making typically subordinate elements such as setting and sound effects crucial to navigating the virtual spaces.
 

This restructuring makes the Myst player very aware of the possibilities of this space. The act of constantly clicking on things that don't do anything makes you aware of how many things could have a function.There is no obvious difference between objects which are significant to the narrative/puzzle and objects which are not, so the player is constantly aware of things that could lead to a solution but do not. In Myst you are frequently aware of the road not traveled by the software designers. While playing Myst, I experienced a bit of what Julia Kristeva's concept of the chora must be like: a space of generative potential, a space structured by possibility more than by firm actuality.
 

It is much more difficult to get a sense of this possibility in narratives which unfold at a pace outside the viewer's control (such as film or theater). For example, Hollywood film opens up narrative possibilities (will she be rescued? killed? will she escape?) only to close them down with a clear answer in a few minutes, giving the particular arrangement of plot events in a film a sense of inevitability. After we have seen the outcome, it is sometimes hard to reconstruct the feeling we once had that there could have been other possible outcomes. In Myst our narrative questions can remain open for a much longer time (even indefinitely) .This makes us intensely aware of all the potential solutions for this particular Myst puzzle which unfortunately do not work. Because we stay in this limbo for such a long period of time, this awareness of the narrative roads not taken is heightened.The difference between traveling through diegetic space in Myst and in classical film is comparable to the difference in the attention you give to a new location when making a map of it as you travel versus the attention given to a new place when you already have a map in hand.
 

Oddly enough, that sense of the potential of Myst's landscapes seemed to disappear once I had solved the puzzle.Once I hit upon the solution I found it difficult to remember the many other solution attempts I tried unsuccessfully. The space transformed from chora to topos in my memory, with the designer's solution seeming somehow obvious.The space changed in my mind from the interactive space of multiple possibilities to the singular space designed by the CD-ROM's authors.
 

Author

 

"I read about some of those mysteries [of science and nature] and look at the world around me in its complexity, and I am just awed. From my point of view, there is a creator in all that. It is hard to express my awe at the detail and craftsmanship in what I see."

- Rand Miller, cocreator of Myst ("Mystery," 1995)

 

The process of playing Myst involves becoming familiar with "Myst logic," or in other words, trying to reconstruct how the authors think in order to better understand how these worlds are put together. While I was stuck trying to solve a puzzle, I would envision all kinds of possible solutions to attempt, many of them relying on elaborate and minute connections among the various elements in the space.I pondered the fact that the bedrooms and elevators on Channelwood and the Mechanical Age were in a similar spatial arrangement in relation to each other, and that the bedrooms on these two ages used the same musical motifs.Once the significance of the virtual environments was foregrounded in my mind, I found numerous obscure points of connection. However, I finally realized that some of the patterns I noticed were too obscure for a mass audience to find dependably and use in the solutions.I realized that the creators of Myst could not use too simple nor too complex a solution if they were to sell mass numbers of CD-ROMs, and so it was helpful to conceptualize an author trying to reach a mass audience, an author more resembling a Hollywood director than an idiosyncratic artist such as a Jean-LucGodard. Myst asks you to mindread the implied author in order to understand better the world he has created.
 

One might argue that playing Myst simply involves learning the intrinsic rules of this diegetic world without reference to an authorial presence, but the Myst story itself foregrounds the notion of a creator of worlds. A character in the diegesis (Atrus) has "written" these worlds into existence from his own imagination. These ages are creations of his mind, according to the story. This emphasis in the story on the creator of these worlds points us not only to Atrus but to the real life creators of Myst, Robyn and Rand Miller.It is not coincidental that the Miller brothers have received an unprecedented level of publicity for CD-ROM designers (they have been interviewed in People magazine and have appeared in Gap ads[19]). (Reed and Free 1995) Each Myst disk even includes a 13-minute self-promotion video detailing their efforts in The Making of Myst.
 

This authorial presence can be considered as yet another way that Myst narratively justifies the properties and limitations of CD-ROMs. By definition we cannot write to a CD-ROM. As much as we "interact" with it, our interactions are bound.We cannot transgress outside where the authors want us to. And Myst itself is a story about what happens when wanderers stray outside the limitations placed on them by creators.Atrus gives Achenar and Sirrus access to the various ages, but their curiosity overwhelms them, causing most of the ages to be destroyed. In the "winning" ending of Myst, these transgressors are themselves seemingly destroyed by the creator.[20]Myst is a cautionary tale about the potential perils of giving people unbridled access to information, about the dangers of the same curiosity to explore virtual worlds that the game encourages in its players.
 

Although hypermedia is sometimes thought of as the physical embodiment of poststructuralist freedom, this is clearly not true of the hybrid medium of the CD-ROM. As MireilleRosello argues, "the relationship between hypertext and authorship may never be radically reconfigured. . . .the dream of collaborative writing and participatory reading often falls short of the theoretically infinite possibilities offered by hypertexts." (1994, 143-144) Barthes and Foucault notwithstanding, the author is not dead. He/she is alive and well and living on MystIsland.
 

The foregrounding of the author is perhaps the primary means of shifting a text from a low popular culture status to a high culture status as Art.Works authored by corporate entities (such as Campbell's soup can labels) tend not to be given the cultural cachet associated with works by an individual artist, which poses a problem in gaining status for media which are necessarily collaborative because of their complexity (such as filmmaking or CD-ROM developing). Associating the cinema with "auteurs" such as Fellini and Bergman, the art cinema in the 1950's raised the status of the cinematic medium. The art cinema offered film style which was clearly different from the industrially manufactured product of the Hollywood studios.By marketing these works of individual "artists," the art cinema brought the "lost audience" (those who preferred books and theater over Hollywood) into the theater, and therefore gained a new customer base and a new status as "art."
 

Throughextratextual discourse and the structure of the game itself, Myst emphasizes the presence of a Creator, a Maker of worlds, an Author.[21]Publicity about the Miller brothers encourages us to read the software as being "written" by their artistic visions rather than "developed" by a faceless corporate entity. Emphasizing authorship is a crucial part of Myst's attempt to distance itself from the dominant conception of CD-ROMs. This strategy complements Myst's rejection of certain lower cultural associations of the CD-ROM's dominant paradigm.Rejecting explicit physical violence, emphasizing deliberative thought over muscular reaction time, and foregrounding authorship, Myst creates a coherent strategy to gain higher cultural status than other CD-ROMs and to open up CD-ROMs to a "lost audience" who values the rarefied pleasures of intellectual reflection, not the "lower" pleasures of gore and quick reflexes. Myst's emphasis on the author announces that the CD-ROM game is now capable of "art" and not merely diverting products such as Doom. As Myst demonstrates, when a killer application changes our conception of a medium, it also frequently changes its class appeal to an audience.
 

Hybrid Text, Hybrid Criticism

Myst uses new technology to emphasize the status of the author and to commemorate that antiquated technology called the book.By making books the central links between ages, it celebrates the book's capacity to take readers to new worlds. Less overtly, Myst's intricate imagery points out a shortcoming of books: the inability to portray those worlds with detailed signification. The blend of postmodern technology and premodern imagery (books, gears, boilers)[22] helps Myst to position itself on the frontier of a new medium.
 

Myst blends old and new in creating worlds that are undeniably fabricated and yet familiarly worn. Details in its virtual worlds show that the "wood" has been "aged," the surfaces have been "worn," and that nails have been "hammered."  This is a world that has been built by hand (authored) as much as it has been manufactured. This calls to mind the industrial practice Stuart Ewen mentions that was used at the beginning of the 19th century to make manufactured goods seem handmade.When industrial capitalism began to boom, many factories used mechanical production to stamp a hand-worked look onto the surfaces of the goods they produced, providing a link to the recent artisanal past and making the mass produced surfaces seem more familiar. (1988, 32-33) Myst's hybrid form allows us to mix our pleasures: the pleasure of handmade craftsmanship and the pleasure of cutting edge technology; the pleasure of being told a story by a storyteller and the pleasure of exploring a storyspace on our own.
 

Mixing the familiar with intriguing new technology works well for new commercial objects of material and symbolic culture. Killer applications are heralded as embodiments of the new, but they tend to blend in established forms with their innovations, just as early narrative cinema took plots from well-known novels, plays, and tales (Uncle Tom's Cabin, Little Red Riding Hood) to root its narrative and stylistic experimentations in comfortably familiar territory.Recall that even the novel itself began as a mix of components taken from other familiar forms (Greek classical literature, picaresque tales, romantic and pastoral cycles).A killer application by definition must be new, but not so new that its foreignness makes it commercially unviable.[23]To see clearly what is innovative about a killer application, it is productive to view it as a hybrid, a mix of current entertainment forms. Treating Myst as part game, part book, and part movie helps show what makes Myst truly distinctive as a CD-ROM: its seamless interface; its narrative justification of the drawbacks of the new technology; the way its player movements simulate intuition; its rejection of time deadlines; the way it encourages curiosity about the possibilities of its spaces; and its foregrounding of the author.
 

A hybrid conception of new media can create criticism which goes beyond the commonplace descriptions in the popular press. To say that Myst is "interactive" or "intuitive" or "close to virtual reality" is correct, but what do those general terms mean? Paying attention to the components of CD-ROM narration helps us to see better how these terms, which are inherited from utopian popular discourse, structure the meanings provided by a particular text.
 

Such a hybrid media form using hybrid content seems to call for a hybrid criticism. A critical approach which samples from established methodologies can provide close attention to individual instances of new media. I began conceptualizing this paper as a straightforward narratological investigation of how we make sense out of Myst's narrative, space, and time, given that we are initially given no overt goals and no instructions on how to proceed. I soon felt that such a programmatic approach missed much more than it explained, and I began this essay with its blend of Julia Kristeva, David Bordwell, Stuart Ewen, and Greg Smith. Close attention to the surfaces of these texts should usefully counterbalance current scholars' emphasis on the potential of the medium, which too often tends to fall into the trap of accepting the utopian rhetoric of popular marketing concerning the "interactivity" of new technologies.These discourses are important, but they and the technological objects they describe should both be scrutinized through critical eyes. Just as Myst switches from movie to game to book, the CD-ROM critic should be able to switch from one analytic tool to another to follow the path blazed by this new and old medium.
 

I wish to thank Bob Lisson for acting as therapist and coach during my Myst playing experience.

 
 

WORKS CITED

Afternoon, a story.Eastgate Systems, Cambridge, MA.

Arnheim, Rudolf. 1957. Film As Art. Berkeley:University of California Press.

Beekman, George, and Ben Beekman. 1994. Myst 1.0. MacWorld, March, 76.

Bordwell, David. 1985. Narration in the Fiction Film. Madison:Univerisity of Wisconsin Press.

Bolter, J. David. 1991. Writing Space:The Computer, Hypertext, and the History of Writing. Hillsdale, NJ:Lawrence Erlbaum.

Carroll, Jon. 1994. Guerrillas in the Myst.Wired, August, 70.

Davis, Erik. 1994. Into the Myst. Village Voice, 23 August, 45-46.

Delany, Paul, and George Landow, eds.1991. Hypermedia and Literary Studies. Cambridge:Massachusetts Institute of Technology Press.

Desmond, Michael, Steve Fox, Jeff Bertolucci, Eric Bender, Michael S. Lasky, Heidi Wolff, Gregg Keizer, Leslie Crawford, and Laurianne McLaughlin. 1994. Games and Leisure. PC World, December, 132-135.

Doane, Mary Ann.The Voice in the Cinema:The Articulation of Body and Space.In Nichols 1985.

Ewen, Stuart. 1988. All Consuming Images:The Politics of Style in Contemporary Culture.New York:Basic Books.

Gillen, Marilyn A. 1994. Interactive Gamers Try to Follow Enveloping Myst. Billboard, 9 July, 1, 100.

Grunin, Lori. 1994. Solve, Shoot, and Puzzle Your Way to Holiday Gaming Happiness. PC

Magazine, 6 December, 508-509.

Harpold, Terence. Threnody: Psychoanalytic Digressions on the Subject of Hypertexts. In Delany and Landow 1991.

Hypertext '89: Proceedings, ACM Conference on Hypertext, November 5-8, Pittsburgh, PA. 1989. New York:Association of Computing Machinery.

Katz, Jon. 1994. Rom and Roll.Rolling Stone, 7 April, 43-46.

Landow, George P.,ed.1994. Hyper/Text/Theory.Baltimore:JohnsHopkinsUniversity Press.

Levy, Steven. 1995. Myst. Macworld, January, 102.

Lindstrom, Bob. 1994. Entertainment Choice. Compute! August, 86-87.

McGowan, Chris. 1995. CD-ROM Successes: How They Happen. Billboard, 18 February, 68, 75.

Metz, Christian. 1974. Film Language: A Semiotics of the Cinema. Chicago:University of Chicago Press.

________. 1982. The Imaginary Signifier: Psychoanalysis and the Cinema. Translated by Celia Britton, Annwyl Williams, Ben Brewster, and Alfred Guzzetti.Bloomington:IndianaUniversity Press.

Miller, Michael J. 1994.After Hours. PC Magazine, 20 December, 144.

Moulthrop, Stuart. 1989. Hypertext and AtheHyperreal."In Hypertext '89.

The Mystery in Learning. 1995. Electronic Learning, May/June, 26-28.

Nichols, Bill, ed. 1985. Movies and Methods vol. 2.Berkeley:University of California Press.

Pipes, David."Myst by Broderbund." Game Bytes 18; available from

http://sunsite.unc.edu/GameBytes/Issue18/greviews/myst/myst.html; Internet.

Reed, Susan, and Cathy Free. 1995. CD(ROM) of Brotherly Loves. People,16 January, 185-186.

Rosello, Mireille. The Screener's Maps:Michel de Certeau's "Wandersmanner" and Paul Auster'sHypertextual Detective. In Landow 1994.

Rothstein, Edward. 1994. A New Art Form May Arise From the Myst. New York Times, 4 December, H1, 24, 25.

Siegel, David. Spinning Pizza into Gold: A Structural Analysis of Myst. Available from

 
 
 
 

Endnotes