![]()
![]()
![]()
A fuzzy situation requires an evaluation tool that examines the depth, breadth and creativity of the response. This fair evaluation may be achieved by the use of a rubric. The following are examples of rubrics which may be used to assess a fuzzy situation.
![]()
Criteria Points
|
Identified social relevance in one area of impact |
|
|
Identified social relevance in one to two areas of impact |
|
|
Identified social relevance in three or more areas of impact |
|
|
|
|
|
Predicted/Discussed pros and cons of one outcome |
|
|
Predicted/Discussed pros and cons of two outcomes |
|
|
Predicted/Discussed pros and cons of three or more outcomes |
|
|
|
|
|
Creativity |
|
|
|
|
|
Level of logical progression |
|
|
|
|
|
Level and accuracy of science facts to support the positions stated |
|
|
|
|
|
Applied to other disciplines other than science |
|
|
|
|
|
Clarity of expression |
|
|
|
|
|
Suggested Action |
|
|
Total Possible Points
|
|
Criteria Points
|
Identified and explained one possible outcome listing at least one negative and one positive result. |
|
|
|
|
|
Identified and explained two possible outcomes listing at least one negative and one positive result. |
|
|
|
|
|
Identified and explained more than two possible outcomes listing one negative and one positive result. |
|
|
|
|
|
Identified and explained two or more outcomes and gave more than one positive and negative results. |
|
|
|
|
|
Make a sound prediction for one possible outcome |
|
|
Make predictions for the various outcomes |
|
|
|
|
|
Incorporated at least two scientific facts to back up the prediction |
|
|
Incorporated more than two scientific facts to back up the predictions |
|
|
|
|
|
For creative outcomes and predictions |
|
|
Total Possible Points
|
|
Criteria Points
|
Identified social relevance by one example |
|
|
Identified social relevance by two or more examples |
|
|
|
|
|
Gave a counter argument or alternative idea (balance of views) |
|
|
|
|
|
Made one decision or identified one outcome |
|
|
Made two or more decisions or outcomes |
|
|
|
|
|
Made a prediction with supporting facts |
|
|
Made more than one prediction with supporting facts |
|
|
|
|
|
Mentioned other disciplines- history, humanities, music, math |
|
|
|
|
|
Suggested an action to take |
|
|
|
|
|
Incorporated poorly defined science facts |
|
|
Incorporated good science facts -but not supportive of problem |
|
|
Incorporated good science facts that support the problem well |
|
|
|
|
|
Related self or individual to the topic |
|
|
|
|
|
Total Possible Points
|
|