A fuzzy situation requires an evaluation tool that examines the depth, breadth and creativity of the response. This fair evaluation may be achieved by the use of a rubric. The following are examples of rubrics which may be used to assess a fuzzy situation.

Criteria Points

 

Identified social relevance in one area of impact 

Identified social relevance in one to two areas of impact 

Identified social relevance in three or more areas of impact 

Predicted/Discussed pros and cons of one outcome 

Predicted/Discussed pros and cons of two outcomes 

Predicted/Discussed pros and cons of three or more outcomes 

Creativity 

1-3 

Level of logical progression 

1-3 

Level and accuracy of science facts to support the positions stated 

1-3 

Applied to other disciplines other than science 

Clarity of expression 

Suggested Action 

Total Possible Points 

20 

Criteria Points

 

Identified and explained one possible outcome listing at least one negative and one positive result. 

Identified and explained two possible outcomes listing at least one negative and one positive result. 

Identified and explained more than two possible outcomes listing one negative and one positive result. 

Identified and explained two or more outcomes and gave more than one positive and negative results. 

Make a sound prediction for one possible outcome 

Make predictions for the various outcomes 

Incorporated at least two scientific facts to back up the prediction 

Incorporated more than two scientific facts to back up the predictions 

For creative outcomes and predictions 

Total Possible Points 

10 

Criteria Points

 

Identified social relevance by one example 

Identified social relevance by two or more examples 

Gave a counter argument or alternative idea (balance of views) 

Made one decision or identified one outcome 

Made two or more decisions or outcomes 

Made a prediction with supporting facts 

Made more than one prediction with supporting facts 

Mentioned other disciplines- history, humanities, music, math 

Suggested an action to take 

Incorporated poorly defined science facts 

Incorporated good science facts -but not supportive of problem 

Incorporated good science facts that support the problem well 

Related self or individual to the topic 

Total Possible Points 

14