History of Ancient and Medieval Philosophy Final Exam Essay Questions
Here are the essays which might appear on the final exam. Out of the following essays, you will have to write on two. The final exam is on Wed, Dec. 10, 12:30 p.m. in the classroom. The review session will be at 3:00 p.m. Monday Dec. 8, in the philosophy conference room, 11th floor 34 Peachtree. Please bring a blue book.
Each of these essays is designed to give you the opportunity to demonstrate to me how well you understand the class material. In order to do this, imagine that you are trying to explain the subject to your intelligent, but ignorant, roommate. That is, state things clearly enough, explaining any technical terminology, offering examples where they are needed for illustration, and expanding on any cryptic or compressed remarks, so that a person not already familiar with the material would understand what you mean. By doing this, you'll show me that you understand what you're talking about. However, don't go off into irrelevant areas or offer information that is not needed to answer the question; don't pad.
In each of the essays below, I give a number of points that I want you to touch upon. However, please do not simply answer them one-by-one, in a disconnected, "bullet-point," manner. Incorporate your discussion of each of the points within a continuous, coherent, flowing essay on the topic. The parts of the essay do not necessarily need to be treated in order in which I mention them.
To prepare for the exam, work through the answers to the following essay questions. A good way to do philosophy is to talk about it with other people, so studying with others in the class may be useful.
- Epicurus on the mind. Explain the Epicurean arguments for (i) what sort of thing the mind is (in particular, why it is something bodily), and for (ii) why death is annihilation, given that the mind is something bodily. Then evaluate the arguments for either (i) or (ii).
- Epicurus' ethics. Explain some of the main features of Epicurus' ethics by answering the following questions. Why does Epicurus think that the only thing that is intrinsically valuable is one's own pleasure? Explain Epicurus' divisions of the different types of pleasure, and different types of desires. How do these relate to his recommendations about how to achieve happiness? And what is the relationship, according to Epicurus, between being virtuous and being happy? Evaluate one or more of Epicurus' arguments on the questions above.
- Epicurus on Justice. Write an essay explaining Epicurus' theory of justice. Make sure that you explain the following points along the way: what is justice, according to Epicurus? What reason does the wise person have to be just? What about the foolish person? What would Epicurus say if confronted with the story of the Ring of Gyges? How does Epicurus' theory of justice fit into his overall ethical views? Then evaluate some aspect of Epicurus arguments regarding either (a) what justice is, or (b) why one should be just.
- Augustine on faith and skepticism. Explain Augustine's conception of faith. Make sure that you include a discussion of the relationship betwen faith and reason, and faith and understanding, and (of course) his justifications for his positions. Also discuss how his conception of faith relates to his attack on the Academic Skeptics. Why does Augustine think that the Academic Skeptics' position is not only false but also profoundly damaging? Then evaluate Augustine's conception of faith and why it is necessary: do you agree with it, and why or why not?
- Knowing God and happiness. Arguing from a basically Aristotelian ethical position, Aquinas argues that full human happiness consists in knowing God. Explain his reasons for thinking this (and how it fits within his Aristotelianism), then indicate whether you agree, and why (or why not).
Return to the Ancient and Medieval Philosophy web site.
Return to the course materials index.
Return to Tim O'Keefe's homepage.