Downloaders rush to delete music files
Reaction to
lawsuits: Threat deters some copiers, but not all, from 'free'
tunes.
Phil Kloer -
Staff
The
Atlanta Journal Constitution
Wednesday, September 10, 2003
When University of Georgia junior Lindsay Gritzmaker heard that the
record industry had pulled the trigger and was suing individual
music downloaders, she got the same feeling as when she's speeding
and sees a roadside cop: "Oh no, don't let him catch me," Gritzmaker
said.
So on Monday, the day the lawsuits were filed, Gritzmaker deleted
the music file-sharing program Kazaa from her computer, and one of
her two roommates did the same. On the youth grapevine, from UGA to
metro Atlanta high schools, the lawsuits and music downloading are
suddenly a hot topic.
The Recording Industry Association of America (RIAA), which
represents the major record labels, may have finally hit on a
solution to the downloading of copyrighted music via the Internet,
something about 60 million Americans do regularly.
By suing 261 individual downloaders on Monday for federal
copyright violations, it has struck at its own consumer base, but
may put a serious dent in a phenomenon that has been growing since
Napster hit in 1999.
The lawsuits targeted people with more than 1,000 songs on their
computer hard drives, but RIAA spokesman Jonathan Lamy said the
suits are "only the first wave."
"They know they cannot stop this completely, but it will curtail
it slightly," said Perry Binder, a Georgia State University legal
studies professor and expert in Internet law.
Even the threat of lawsuits, announced in late June, seems to
have put a significant damper on downloading. From June to August,
people using Kazaa, the most popular file-sharing program, declined
from 6.5 million to 4.8 million a week, a 26 percent drop.
Although the lawsuits have caused anxiety among some downloaders,
others aren't concerned.
"I bet most Georgia State students have downloaded music. How are
they going to track all of them?" said Julia Wysocki, an 18-year-old
GSU freshman.
And even as the RIAA goes after users of the major post-Napster
programs like Kazaa, Morpheus and Grokster, many other file-sharing
programs have been appearing, some of which are designed for greater
anonymity.
"I use a Korean server to download so they can't track it," said
Georgia State student Jungmin Lee, 19.
The RIAA suits target the person who pays for the Internet
connection over which the music was downloaded, which means in some
cases parents are being sued when it was their teenagers downloading
music.
Adam Nevis, 42, a property damage adviser from Canton, said when
he heard about the RIAA crackdown, he warned his 14-year-old
daughter Samantha about downloading songs off their shared computer
and cable modem. "I understand they're looking for the big boys, but
I'm not going to take that chance," he said. "I told her to lay
low."
The industry argues that downloading has caused the huge drop in
CD sales of 26 percent since 1999 (the year Napster appeared), a
loss of $4.3 billion. Critics of the industry say other reasons are
also to blame.
Even though the RIAA campaign appears to have cut down on
file-sharing, it hasn't helped CD sales --- just the opposite. In
the seven weeks since the RIAA announced it would sue downloaders,
CD sales fell 54 percent compared to the same period last year,
although whether any of that was spurred by anti-RIAA campaigns on
the Internet or grass-roots resentment is impossible to determine.
--- Compiled by staff writers Shane Harrison and Rodney Ho.
|