|
|
|
Lesson
Plan for Questions & Commands
by Sandy
Lima
|
Indepth
Outline
|
| Lesson
1 |
|
On p. 181,
the various purposes for questions are outlined. These can be divided
up among the students to be reviewed and presented to the class
in deductive or inductive format. The teacher could guide the students
via elicited examples, situational prompts or dialogues to an awareness
of the different functions of questions. Following this, students
could then be assigned a question type and asked to present, perform
or conduct a short dialogue, interview, Q/A exchange, questionnaire
in class or to be done outside class. In this activity, while the
students present their group work to the whole class and even while
working in their groups the teacher will monitor and provide help
as needed. To present/review yes/no questions in a inductive way,
the teacher can use examples from ex. pp.185-186. S/he provides
several groups of pieces of paper. Each group contains the steps
of changes of one affirmative statement to a yes-no question. Each
step is written on a single piece of paper. The teacher mixes up
all the pieces of papers belonging to different groups. The students
work in small groups and they are supposed to match these pieces
of papers to their original groups and put these steps of changes
in correct order. Each group will find one group of papers and later
present the correct order of these steps of changes they found out
and explain the reason of this ordering to the whole class. Finally,
the teacher will sum up the rules of forming different types of
yes-no questions using examples the class just worked on and he/she
will distribute handout on this grammar topic to the students.
Activity
1: Students sit in several rows in the classroom. Each row of
students is a group. The teacher passes a piece of note with a sentence
from exercises A and/or B pp. 183-4 on it to the first student in
each row. The note is passed to the next student after the first
student writes down one step of change toward a yes-no question.
The sentences for different groups should be equally difficult,
that is all either have overt aux./be form or have non-overt ones.
Then different rows of students will have a competition in seeing
which group is the first one to change this statement into sentence.
Certain rules are needed here. This is a written activity, each
student can only write down one step of changes (do one thing in
the process of changing and write it down), for instance, s/he can
only add an non-overt aux. needed in the sentence, and wait for
next student to write down the inverted sentence with the auxiliary
moved to the front. In this way, students have to be very clear
about the process of yes-no question formation; besides, they need
to practice team cooperation spirit before they can win this game.
Variation:
The teacher passes a jumbled question to each row. The task is to
find the correct question order. Students would be working on word
order.
Activity
2: Section A on pp. 185-6 could initially be handled orally,
without having students read the sentences. Teacher could read the
sentence and ask for its question. As a short extension between
each statement/question, a student could be asked, upon giving a
question, to ask another student a similar question. Second, students
are asked to look at the sentences in their books, and write their
corresponding questions, noting whether there is an overt or non-overt
auxiliary present. In order to practice and produce some of these
items, students could be asked in pairs to come up with a dialogue
incorporating as many of the questions they have just formed in
a logical, cohesive fashion. These are presented before the class,
and students are asked to listen and note how many of the questions
each pair use, and then rate in pairs from, let's say, 1-10 on an
interesting scale, logical scale, funny scale, etc. each dialogue.
The pair who used the most questions with the highest average rating
is the winner. Activity 3: Teacher asks one student as chairperson
to come to the front of the classroom. The chairperson decides one
object/a creature (a person/animal/plant)/anything existing in the
world in his/her mind. The other students asks the chairperson yes-no
questions, and s/he can only answer yes or no to their questions.
The whole class has to get the object in the student's mind within
20 questions. The student who gets the final correct answer will
be the next chairperson of this activity. At first, the range of
guessing can be limited, for instance, to one person in the classroom.
Students can ask yes-no questions such as "Is it a person?" "Is
this person a male student?" "Is he taller than David?" "Does he
talk a lot in class?" Later the range can be expanded to, e.g.,
one person in the school. And finally the range can be limitless,
including anything in the world.
Homework:
The 'do you,' 'did you' format could be introduced with an information
questionnaire completed as homework. The topic would be: "What are
you like?" Some questions could be: "Do you often help other people?"
"Do you care if people like you or not?" "Do you try harder to do
something if you will get paid for doing it? "Did you learn to ride
a bike when you were young?" "Did you have older siblings when you
were born?" "Did you ever teach yourself to do something?"
|
| Lesson
2 |
|
The teacher
could use page 189-A to present/review information questions in
a student-centered activity. S/he could first have the students
change the sentences listed in activity A to information questions.
After the students finish that s/he could have them work together
in pairs to write 10 information questions that they feel would
be useful in their every day activities, such as: What time does
the bus leave? Then the teacher would ask the students for some
of the questions that they came up with and would write them on
the board. The students would talk about their relevance and write
them down if they feel that they would be useful in their own lives.
Activity
1: For reviewing the basic grammar of information questions,
the teacher gives the students a handout with columns headed Who,
What, Where, When, Why, How, How much, How many. Then the teacher
reads 20 statement sentences aloud, and the students have to slot
the numbers of the sentences under the correct question word heading.
Like in the examples on p. 186, The teacher reads: 1. Someone will
teach my grammar class this term. The students have to slot #1 under
the Who column. The teacher reads: 2. The class starts at 3:00.
The students have to slot #2 under When. After the students self-correct
the answers with the teacher going over them, the students could
be put into pairs to actually write the questions.
Activity
2: For the next exercise, the teacher could give pairs or triads
about 3 statements and the students have to make up every kind of
question for each statement. For example: The shoe store downtown
is having a sale. 1. When does the sale start? 2. What are the hours
the store is open? 3. How much will be shoes be discounted? 4.How
many items are going to be on sale? 5.Where is the store located?
6. Why aren't there any shoes on sale in my size? 7. Who told you
about the sale? All of these questions could easily be converted
into a dialogue or skit later on.
Activity
3: Students are put into groups, and asked to brainstorm 3 questions
of a "nosy" nature. Teacher may need to model a few, for example,
"What turns you on?" or "What is the least/most favorite part of
your body?" I tell you what, it can be a riot to hear what students
come up with--that is clean, and this must be emphasized. So, after
each group has 3 questions, the teacher or students write them on
the board. Then each person is randomly assigned 3 questions, and
asked to mingle about the class collecting answers to their questions
from each student. Allow plenty of time here. Then, the teacher
writes all the students' names on slips of paper and redistributes,
making sure everyone gets s/o else's name. Give out blank sheets
of paper and ask the students to draw a photo sized box at the top
of the piece of paper. Explain to students that they have to prepare
a profile of the person whose name they've got, including a portrait
and as diverse information as possible. Teacher can quickly present
a model from a previous class. Students wander around again asking
each other for information about the subject of their profile. Depending
on the age and nature of the class, either keep or remove all of
the questions on the board. Students can of course interview their
subject directly if need be. Variation: As an ESL class usually
composes students from many different countries, the teacher can
encourage students to ask wh-questions based on general factual
cultural differences, for instance, very simple questions like "Which
country are you from?" "How do you go to school in your country?"
"What kind of food do you usually have in your country?" "Who is
the present in your country?". Ask students from different countries
to tell the whole class the kind of sensitive, impolite or taboo
questions not welcomed in their cultures. After students get to
know each other better through step1 &2. They can further ask each
other questions involving cultural differences without mentioning
those impolite questions in step 2.
Homework:
The written part of activity 2 and/or its variation can be finished
by homework. The following class, the finished profiles can be put
on the walls to let the students admire (and sure to get a few good
laughs or raised eyebrows) each others work.
|
| Lesson
3 |
|
The teacher
could present/review tag questions and embedded questions in a teacher-centered
activity. Eliciting examples from students, s/he could write them
on the board, guiding students to discover the formation and use
of tag questions and all the changes applied for embedded questions.
The following student-centered activities allow students to practice
and produce this types of question sentences. Activity 1: Teacher
copies and cuts up each sentence from exercise on p. 192 with its
corresponding tag. So there should be 18 sentences and 18 tags.
Each student receives either a sentence or tag (the teacher needs
to make sure that there is a relatively equal number of each given
out with a few matches, for example 8 and 8). Students are asked
to mingle about and find their correct tag mate. When they have,
they bring them to the teacher who asks for the whole sentence/tag
to be read out loud. If correct, they are given another tag or statement
to mingle about with. This continues until all the matches have
been made. After, students are asked to do the exercise individually,
noting non-overt tags
Activity
2: For tag questions, the teacher could do a variation on the
Animal, Vegetable, Mineral game (also called -- What am I Thinking?).
Normally this is a yes/no question game - a person thinks of something
in 1 of the 3 categories, and is asked questions which can be answered
yes or no until someone guesses what they're thinking. The tag variation
could be that each question has to be a tag question: "It isn't
an animal, is it?" "It doesn't have 4 legs, does it?" This is a
great way to introduce reverse psychology because the person is
actually asking something in a negative manner that they're positively
thinking (they really think the animal does have 4 legs). This also
can be related to politeness, because many times a tag question
is used as an indirect way of politely probing: "You're not sad
about something, are you?" instead of saying something direct, like:
"You look awful! Did someone die?"
Activity
3: For embedded questions, the teacher asks students to write
out two questions, one yes-no question and a wh- question. Maybe,
to avoid repetition the teacher can provide different subjects to
each student. For example: school, job, family, sports, hobbies,
pets, etc. In a circle, the teacher asks the first student a question.
S/he has to change the question to be part of a statement and tell
the other students. For example, "She asked me if I am a good student".
This student asks the next student a question that will be reported
as the example above. For the second round, the teacher can ask
students to change verb tenses as in formal written English. For
example, "She asked me if I was a good student". Later, the teacher
can dictate all questions and students can change them to be part
of a statement for homework, both formal and informal version when
possible. Variation: Another possibility is a "passing-word" activity,
choosing any of these wh-questions listed in the parenthesis on
ex. page 195, the teacher whispers the same question to the first
student of each row. For instance, the teacher whispers this question
"where does Juan live" to the first student, the second student
asks the first student by whispering "What did the teacher say/tell
you?", the first student will whisper this embedded question back
to the second one "the teacher/he/she asked where Juan lives." Then
this embedded question is whispered to until the last student of
this row. All the last students in each row will report to the whole
class the sentence they have finally. Next time, the teacher will
choose another wh-question and the second student in the row in
the first round will be the first student in this round. This activity
can be repeated in several times until each student is given the
opportunity to change the wh-questions into embedded questions.
Activity
4: This activity is called "Go-between" and it's kind of a relay
race in reporting/asking questions. It can take many forms, but
in a nutshell, here's how it works. Teacher or students come up
with a few good, juicy topics and/or questions. These are written
down on slips of paper. Let's say you need 20 or so. These are collected
and shuffled. Put students into teams of 3- 2 question askers and
1 go-between. They decide who's who, but they will eventually rotate.
Teams are given an equal number of slips and told that the first
team that goes all of the slips first wins. So, the go-between must
run back and forth reporting what each other member has said. Each
slip counts as one back and forth exchange. This can be a real hoot.
When then slips run out, generate some more with the students and
rotate people in their teams and off they go again. Good stuff.
Homework:
The teacher dictates all questions from activity 3 and students
should change them to be part of a statement for homework, both
formal and informal version when possible.
|
| Lesson
4 |
|
Under the "Commands"
heading, it would be good to include polite requests and responses,
such as structures like "Could you...?", "Would/Do you mind if I...?"
This highlights the fact that questions can perform other functions
other than being primarily information-gathering devices, as well
as emphasizing the importance of formality, register and appropriacy
in relation to a context. To show the difference between a command
and a polite request, the teacher could start with the whole class
brainstorming. The teacher could write a command on the board, and
take suggestions for how to make it into a polite request. For example:
Shut up. Polite options: Could you please stop talking? Would you
listen up please? Would you mind if (or Could) I interrupt you for
a minute? The teacher could personalize it by saying that s/he often
has to think how to say something politely to the students so that
they do not feel that they are being disrespected, and that with
a little effort, politeness can be developed naturally. Also, everyone
appreciates politeness, and a person usually can more easily get
what they want by being polite. The teacher could find some sayings,
like "You can attract more bees with honey than with vinegar." to
discuss and drive the point home.
Activity
1: The teacher could have students come up two at a time, and
give them each a placard. One says Rude and the other says Polite.
The teacher could give each one a statement, like: "You want your
friend to pick you up in their car and take you to the mall." Each
student has 30 seconds to think of a way to ask their friend in
a polite or rude way. Having the two ways side by side like that
will make the students laugh and they'll remember the polite way
better because of the juxtaposition.
Activity
2: This activity is called Oral Charades. The teacher prepares
enough slips for every student. Each slip has an everyday item on
it, like a shirt, a banana, a paper clip. To make it easier, the
teacher could do categories, like food, classroom objects, clothing,
or household items. The student who chooses the slip of paper has
to tell the class how to draw the item without telling them what
the item is until the time is up (say, 5 minutes).
Activity
3: The next activity is Art Nouveau. The students are partnered
and given a sheet of paper, scissors, tape, marker, a button, and
rubber bands. Then they follow the teacher's commands: Draw a circle
with the marker on the paper. Cut the rubber bands. Tape the button.
The trick is that each command is vague enough so that every pair
of students' art will look different. This exercise could be altered
in a bunch of different ways to include enough adverbs, adjectives,
and prepositional phrases so that each pair would come out with
exactly the same art result at the end.
Homework:
The teacher asks students to write a practical problem they could
have (it doesn't need to be real, of course) in a piece of paper.
One or two sentences, not more than that. For example, "My neighbor's
dog barks all the night long, and I can't sleep." Teacher shuffles
the pieces of paper and hand them out to different students. Teacher
asks students to write two or three pieces of advice for homework
using commands. For example, "Report to your landlord what is going
on", or "Call your neighbor and let him know you can't sleep because
of his dog". Next class, volunteers can read their pieces of advice.
|
| Lesson
5 |
|
General
Review: On p.197 section A, there is an activity for revising
and practicing questions using a short, videotaped segment. This
activity may take various forms, but here some specific ways to
use the material: Students may given tactile snippets with question
and answers which appear in the segment. They piece what they can
together before viewing, then finish the rest, check and order the
Q/As while viewing; students may be told the context and asked to
brainstorm probable questions, comparing them with those in the
segment; students could be given the questions and answers in the
segment beforehand, and asked to match the questions with the correct
answers, guess the context/topic, and order the question/answers
as they listen; Students could also be told the context of the segment,
then they listen silently and write probable questions about the
segment, comparing and answering them in relation to the actual
segment.
Written
test: The teacher provides students with short texts. Students
will select different types of information and yes/no questions
and analyze their word order. Then students can be asked to find
a few declarative sentences and make questions about them.
Oral test:
The teacher gives groups of students some time to compose a dialogue
for a restaurant skit (pp. 200-201). S/he provides the props, like
a table and chairs with 2 to 3 place settings, and short menus in
the target language. The language content is generally food and
restaurant vocabulary, but more advanced students can certainly
concentrate on the question/command aspects. This skit works well
with 3 - 5 students filling the roles of a host/hostess, waiter/waitress,
and 2 - 3 diners. It also works well to encourage the students to
write a comical script. Variation: The teacher decorates the classroom
as a job fair, with different cubicles representing different job
hunter/companies, students will choose either as the interviewer
or the interviewee. In this kind of activity, different types of
questions will be reviewed: wh--where do you see yourself in the
past couple of years? y/n--are you good at computer skills? command--please
fill in this form.
|
  |
|
  |
|