|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
| Screen | Interview | Reference Check | Post a Student Assistant Vacancy | Checking
References on Job Candidates Always
check references GSU's
Office of Human Resources reviews and refers application materials to
the hiring department if the information presented by the candidate satisfies
the posted qualifications for the job. But HR doesn't check references
before referral. As the
hiring supervisor, once you've narrowed down your candidate field to a
couple of finalists, you will need to check references. You should
ALWAYS check references. Unfortunately, people are not always exactly
as they portray themselves to be -- and you owe it to yourself and to
the University know whom you're hiring. The
risks of negligent hiring Insist
on checking supervisory references Candidates
sometimes say they don't want you to contact a former or current supervisor.
There are two common reasons for this reluctance. The first
reason is that they don't want their current boss to know they're job-hunting.
They don't want to burn any bridges with their current employer until
they know they have a new job lined up. The second
reason is that they're afraid their current supervisor will say something
negative about them. If you're
seriously interested in the applicant, you should tell them that they're
a finalist candidate (never say they're the finalist), but that you must
have a full picture of their work history, and therefore must check with
their past and current supervisors, even if the applicant has provided
the names of other individuals in the organization as references. Explain
that if you can't have a discussion with the immediate supervisor, you
may not have enough information about their candidacy to make an informed
decision, and you won't be able to consider them further. Then ask them
to explain their reluctance and work through it with them. If their
current boss doesn't know they're looking, give the candidate some time
(a day or so) to go back and have their own conversation with their supervisor,
so that your reference call won't catch the boss off-guard. If they're
afraid the supervisor will say something bad about them, ask them to describe
what they think the supervisor will say -- and why they think s/he'll
say it. Sometimes supervisors will say discouraging things, even about
good employees, if they're trying to keep the worker from leaving. Sometimes
if there are problems in an employment relationship, the problems are
with the boss -- and not with the employee. And sometimes there's legitimate
negative information that the candidate would rather you not hear. If the
candidate thinks you may get negative information from a current or former
supervisor, assure them that their own explanation of the situation will
also help you weigh what you hear. Encourage the applicant to give you
the names and phone numbers of others in the organization who might be
able to give countering or balancing information. Don't
take no (information) for an answer Even
though some employers say they only give out "name, rank, and serial
number," many organizations do not expressly prohibit supervisors
from providing references on employees. A recent survey by the Society
for Human Resource Management (SHRM) found that 78% of more than 1,300
responding companies say they do provide references. At the
very least, an HR office will usually verify (1) that the individual did
work there, (2) the dates of employment, and (3) the job title. The company
may or may not release salary information or the reason why an employment
relationship ended. However, many organizations will verify or refute
data that you provide to them -- so you can ask questions like, "This
person says her final salary was $10 per hour. Is that consistent with
your records?" Or "This person indicates his employment ended
due to a reduction in workforce. Is that what your records show?"
The respondent can then simply answer with a yes or no. Be
persistent If one
company representative is unwilling to give useful information, try contacting
other references at the same company. If you tried the supervisor, then
try the HR office, or try the supervisor's boss. You can also ask the
candidate for additional names of people familiar with their work. If
a company representative balks, consider asking them if they will speak
with you if the candidate calls them with a verbal release or provides
a written release form (the Human Resources office has a sample release
form). Or ask if they would be willing to answer your questions if you
put them in writing on University letterhead. One strategy
to use with someone who's holding firm to a "no reference" policy
is to tell them you're aware that most employers will give good references
-- so you have to assume that "no reference" implies a bad reference,
and you won't be likely to offer the individual a job. If their response
is basically, "You gotta do what you gotta do," they may be
sending you an implied message that not hiring would be a good idea. But
if they say, "Oh, please don't make that assumption. It's just that
since we don't give bad references, we can't give good ones either,"
then you may be getting between-the-lines positive information. As mentioned
earlier, it's fine to put the responsibility back on the candidate to
help you get references. Good applicants won't have any trouble getting
former employers to speak with you. Have the applicant track down former
supervisors and alert them to your call. Be very suspicious of any candidate
who can't come up with several contactable references -- if all their
former employers have "gone out of business" or every former
supervisor is "no longer with the company," don't hire the person.
Those are clear warning signs of problems. Also be wary of reference letters
provided directly by the candidate-- experts will tell you the applicant
may well have written such letters themselves. Ask
only questions that are directly related to the job The questions
you should ask of a reference are virtually identical to the questions
you would ask of candidates themselves. It helps if you can give the reference
a brief overview of the basic functions of the job you are trying to fill;
that makes it easier for the reference to compare your job to the job
the candidate held with them. If you say, "Here is the type of work I'm looking for this position to accomplish," then you can ask: "How does the work this person did for you translate to what I'm looking for?" Here are some other useful questions (by the way, these are also questions you can re-phrase and ask the applicant in an interview. Then you can compare their answers with their boss's):
You can
ask if there were documented performance problems that might be relevant
to your job. For example, if reliable attendance is an important factor
for your job, you can ask about the candidate's attendance record. But
just like in an interview, phrase your questions carefully to make sure
you are not going to accidentally hear medical or disability information
that could have discriminatory impact on your hiring decision. One way
to ask is: "Other than for legitimate medical or family leave reasons,
did the individual have any documented problems with abusing attendance
or time off?" In general,
stay away from any reference questions that you wouldn't ask the candidate
themselves in an interview. Don't ask personal questions that aren't directly
related to the ability to do the job. Evaluate
negative information with caution Even
if you receive negative information during a reference check, don't immediately
rule out the candidate. Attempt to understand every angle of the circumstances
that caused the problem. Try to get confirming or refuting information
from other sources. If you hear "red flags" in your checks,
please feel free to consult with the Employment office, and we'll help
you analyze the information. However, if it appears that the negative
information is supported by relevant facts, and/or if you get similar
responses from several references, you may choose not to consider the
candidate further. You should
even evaluate positive information carefully. Some folks subscribe to
the "if you can't say something nice don't say anything at all"
school of giving references. Read between the lines -- do you get the
feeling there's something they're not telling you? Are they damning with
faint praise, as the saying goes? If you sense there's something the reference
is avoiding, probe further. But don't promise that what they tell you
is "off the record." If you end up basing your hiring decision
on that information, it will need to be part of your records. Get
at least 3 work references To make
a good decision you will need feedback from at least three referees going
back at least 5 years if possible. Even for entry-level positions that
require little or no prior work experience, you should speak with school
counselors, internship coordinators, major professors, or coordinators
of volunteer activities who are familiar with the candidate in a professional
or academic (rather than social) environment. Don't
bother with personal references Personal
or "character" references are seldom useful. Such individuals
usually can't offer direct information about how a candidate would perform
in a work environment. And often they are personal friends, so their perspectives
will not be neutral and objective. Document
all reference information Document
in writing all the references you attempted to contact, or did contact,
and all the relevant information you received. If you get stonewalled,
document whom you contacted -- and that they refused to give you useful
information. For legal
tracking purposes, you should maintain this documentation for three years,
along with your interview notes and your reasons for non-selection of
all unsuccessful candidates (for more information on interview notes,
see HR's guidelines on Inter viewing). You can keep these materials in
your departmental files. Why do we have to keep them for 3 years? Because
that's the general limit within which an unsuccessful candidate can challenge
your hiring decision to a state or federal equal employment opportunity
agency -- and you need to be able to present contemporaneous records that
prove you made your decision at the time for legitimate reasons, based
on verifiable information and non discriminatory factors. Check
both academic and employment information Companies
that conduct professional background- check services say that applicants
are even more likely to falsify information about their academic backgrounds
than about their work history -- probably because employers are less likely
to check with schools for verification or to require academic transcripts.
Most college Registrar's offices will confirm dates of attendance and
graduation, as well as degrees awarded and majors, upon request. If
you have questions, call HR Remember
that Employment is available to consult with you any time you have questions
or concerns. Our goal is exactly the same as yours: to make sure you hire
the very best person for the job. Please feel free to call us at x 3331. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||