|
|
Design
considerations for teaching as research |
Aspect |
Explanation |
| Teaching as research |
|
| Learning outcome (performance) choices | Selecting learning outcomes that embody professionals' authentic performances (the tasks that professionals perform and the deliverables they create) eliminates memorization as a successful learning tactic and increases the appeal of the project to research journals because of the growing importance of accelerating the development of job-enabling expertise in organizations. |
| Intact sections as the context | The naturally occurring context for generating and evaluating evidence of learning is a set of intact sections of courses that are scheduled by departments. The existence of intact sections facilitates treating all students in the section in the same way, e.g., as a control or treatment condition. |
Potential design tradeoffs engendered by intact sections |
|
| Covariate availability | Some useful covariates may not be available, e.g., institutional records do not contain SAT scores or high school GPAs for transfer students, which may make it desirable to create appropriate pre-measures within the course. |
| Minefield of expectations about instruction |
|
| Institutional Review Board (IRB) approval | Research on learning in courses requires IRB approval, but IRB promises to respond in 48 hours for this kind of research, and approval for classroom research lasts as long as there are no changes. Forms required by the Institutional Review Board are available online from the GSU Office of Research Compliance. |
| Sample designs | Business process modeling as a predictor of: An example with a design error. Can you find it? |