|
|
Design
considerations: Business process modeling as an enabling skill in database
querying and auditing |
Aspect |
Explanation |
||
| Course | Acct
8630 Infomation Systems Assurance |
||
Learning outcome |
Learn
to provide information systems (IS) assurance, defined as:
|
||
| Research questions | Question
1: Model 1 To what extent is business process modeling (BPM) skill associated with querying databases to answer business questions? |
||
| Question
2: Models 2-3 Is BPM skill associated with specific aspects of database querying posed as scientific discovery in multiple problem spaces (Kim and Lerch 1997, Information Systems Reserch 8(1): 25-50)? |
|||
| 1 | Representation space | Encode target problem: Formulate a natural language representation of the queryor's understanding of what is to be obtained from the database. At impasses, change the representation. | |
| 2 | Rule space | Develop
queries (theories/hypotheses in scientific discovery)
|
|
| 3 | Instance space | Evaluate results from queries: Test query results for completeness, reasonability, and applicability in light of all the queryor believes about the business situation. (Klahr and Dunbar 1988. Cognitive Science 12: 1-48) | |
| 4 | Rule space | Refine queries: Repeat steps when results seem deficient. | |
| Theory: From cognition and mirrored in practice | Database querying is a kind of programming, which has been posed by Kim and Lerch (1997) as scientific discovery in multiple problem spaces (representation, rule, and instance). Although, BPM skill seems most closely related to working in the representation space with respect to database querying, it is not clear whether BPM skill might be integral to working in the rule and instance spaces. BPM entails constructing situation models (Zwaan and Radvansky 1998, Psychological Bulletin 123: 162-185; Barsalou 1999, Discourse Processes 28: 61-80). Practitioners and researchers have been coming to the view that understanding business processes is a precursor to developing and executing audit procedures and interpreting results. The lack of a process model or reliance on an inadequate one obscures idiosyncrasies of the situation, which would predispose auditors to applying typical audit procedures in standard ways, which might not reveal the evidence they seek of inconsistencies or unusual conditions. |
||
| Research design possibilities | |||
| Model 1: Single measure of query performance |
This model fails to:
|
||
| Model 2: Components of query performance |
This model:
|
||
Model 3: Components of query performance with BPM skill Q1: Does BPM skill mediate the relationship between BPM training and query performance? Q2: Does query performance devolve to performance in the represen-tation, rule, and instance spaces? Q3: Is query performance by query space associated with audit performance by audit subtask (develop audit objectives, develop audit procedures, implement audit procedures, communicate audit results)? |
This model:
|
||