Scoring
template
TABLE 2 Development of Audit Objectives1 |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
Team |
|
Individual
Participant |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Audit Objective by Assertion |
1 |
2 |
3 |
|
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
9 |
10 |
11 |
12 |
13 |
14 |
15 |
16 |
17 |
|
|||||
|
Number of audit objectives: 8 scored |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
|
Number of audit objectives |
7 |
4 |
9 |
|
6 |
5 |
17 |
12 |
4 |
8 |
4 |
8 |
4 |
4 |
4 |
5 |
4 |
5 |
7 |
4 |
4 |
|
|||||
|
Number of relevant audit objectives (scored as ● or ¤) |
3 |
3 |
3 |
|
5 |
5 |
3 |
5 |
4 |
4 |
4 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
4 |
2 |
3 |
5 |
3 |
1 |
2 |
|
|||||
|
Existence |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
|
Observe client’s year-end inventory count2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
|
Cutoff: Sample receiving reports2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
|
Cutoff: Sample sales transactions2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
|
1. Verify payment for purchases |
¤ |
¤ |
¤ |
|
|
¤ |
|
● |
¤ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
|
2. Verify paid-for inventory adequate for sales (in aggregate) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
|
Completeness |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
|
Trace test counts into inventory compilation2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
|
3. Verify adjustments applied based on year-end count |
¤ |
¤ |
¤ |
|
¤ |
¤ |
● |
● |
● |
● |
¤ |
¤ |
¤ |
● |
● |
¤ |
¤ |
¤ |
¤ |
¤ |
● |
|
|||||
|
4. Verify inclusion of purchases in inventory |
|
|
|
|
● |
|
|
● |
|
● |
|
|
¤ |
|
|
|
¤ |
● |
|
|
|
|
|||||
|
Rights/obligations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
|
Determine whether any inventory is pledged 2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
|
5. Verify that all inventory (by SKU) was purchased |
|
|
|
|
● |
● |
|
|
|
¤ |
|
|
¤ |
● |
● |
|
¤ |
● |
|
|
|
|
|||||
|
Valuation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
|
Vouch sample of inventory items to invoices3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
|
Verify markdowns for sample of oldest SKUs3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
|
Verify reasonableness of client adjustments3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
|
6. Verify application of markdown policy for LCM |
|
¤ |
¤ |
|
● |
|
● |
● |
¤ |
¤ |
● |
● |
¤ |
|
|
|
¤ |
● |
|
|
● |
|
|||||
|
7. Verify agreement of inventory costs and invoice costs |
¤ |
|
|
|
● |
¤ |
|
|
|
|
● |
|
|
¤ |
¤ |
|
|
● |
¤ |
|
|
|
|||||
|
Presentation/disclosure |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
|
Verify mathematical accuracy of inventory calculations 3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
|
8. Verify agreement of detail records with GL balances |
|
|
● |
|
|
¤ |
● |
● |
● |
|
● |
● |
|
¤ |
¤ |
● |
|
|
● |
|
¤ |
|
|||||
1 A dot (●) in a cell denotes a reasonable statement of the audit objective. A circle with a dot (¤) denotes a marginal statement of the audit objective. A blank cell denotes inadequate, erroneous, irrelevant, or missing statements of an audit objective.
2 Audit objective supplied to all participants in prior year audit program; audit objective with results supplied to school 2 participants in current year audit program.
3 Audit objective supplied to participants at school 2 only in current year audit results to date.
TABLE 3 Design of Audit Procedures by Audit Objective1 |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
Team |
|
Individual
Participant |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Audit Objective by Assertion |
1 |
2 |
3 |
|
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
9 |
10 |
11 |
12 |
13 |
14 |
15 |
16 |
17 |
|
|||||
|
Existence |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
|
1. Verify payment for purchases |
¤ |
● |
● |
|
|
¤ |
|
● |
● |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
|
2. Verify inventory consistent with sales (in aggregate) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
|
Completeness |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
|
3. Verify adjustments applied based on year-end count |
● |
● |
● |
|
● |
● |
● |
● |
● |
● |
● |
|
● |
● |
● |
● |
● |
● |
● |
● |
¤ |
|
|||||
|
4. Verify inclusion of purchases in inventory |
|
|
|
|
● |
|
|
● |
|
● |
|
|
● |
|
|
|
● |
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
|
Rights/obligations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
|
5. Verify that all inventory (by SKU) was purchased |
|
|
|
|
● |
● |
|
|
|
● |
|
|
¤ |
● |
● |
|
¤ |
¤ |
|
¤ |
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
|
Valuation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
|
6. Verify application of markdown policy for LCM |
|
● |
● |
|
● |
|
¤ |
● |
¤ |
● |
¤ |
● |
¤ |
|
|
|
¤ |
● |
|
|
● |
|
|||||
|
7. Verify agreement of inventory costs and invoice costs |
● |
|
|
|
● |
|
|
|
|
|
● |
|
|
¤ |
¤ |
|
|
● |
● |
|
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
|
Presentation/disclosure |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
|
8. Verify agreement of detail records with GL balances |
|
|
● |
|
|
● |
¤ |
● |
¤ |
|
● |
● |
|
¤ |
¤ |
¤ |
|
|
● |
|
¤ |
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
1 A dot (●) in a cell denotes a reasonable statement of the design of audit procedures for that audit objective. A circle with a dot (¤) denotes a marginal statement of the audit procedure. A blank cell denotes inadequate, erroneous, or missing, statements of the audit procedure.
TABLE 4 Audit Procedures: Execution of Technical Plan1 |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
Team |
|
Individual
Participant |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Audit Objective by Assertion |
1 |
2 |
3 |
|
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
9 |
10 |
11 |
12 |
13 |
14 |
15 |
16 |
17 |
|
|||||
|
Existence |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
|
1. Verify payment for purchases |
¤ |
● |
● |
|
|
¤ |
|
● |
● |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
|
2. Verify inventory consistent with sales (in aggregate) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
|
Completeness |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
|
3. Verify adjustments applied based on year-end count |
● |
● |
● |
|
● |
● |
|
● |
● |
● |
● |
|
● |
● |
● |
● |
● |
● |
● |
● |
¤ |
|
|||||
|
4. Verify inclusion of purchases in inventory |
|
|
|
|
● |
|
|
● |
|
● |
|
|
● |
|
|
|
● |
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
|
Rights/obligations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
|
5. Verify that all inventory (by SKU) was purchased |
|
|
|
|
● |
¤ |
|
|
|
● |
|
|
¤ |
¤ |
¤ |
|
¤ |
¤ |
|
¤ |
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
|
Valuation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
|
6. Verify application of markdown policy for LCM |
|
● |
● |
|
● |
|
¤ |
● |
¤ |
● |
¤ |
● |
¤ |
|
|
|
● |
● |
|
|
● |
|
|||||
|
7. Verify agreement of inventory costs and invoice costs |
● |
|
|
|
● |
|
|
|
|
|
● |
|
|
¤ |
¤ |
|
|
● |
● |
|
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
|
Presentation/disclosure |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
|
8. Verify agreement of detail records with GL balances |
|
|
● |
|
|
● |
|
|
¤ |
|
● |
● |
|
¤ |
¤ |
¤ |
|
|
● |
|
¤ |
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
1 A dot (●) in a cell denotes a reasonable execution of the audit procedures for that audit objective. A circle with a dot (¤) denotes a marginal execution of the audit procedures. A blank cell denotes inadequate, erroneous, or missing executions of the audit procedures.
TABLE 5 Interpretation of Evidence1 |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
Team |
|
Individual
Participant |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Audit Objective by Assertion |
1 |
2 |
3 |
|
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
9 |
10 |
11 |
12 |
13 |
14 |
15 |
16 |
17 |
|
|||||
|
Existence |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
|
1. Verify payment for purchases |
¤ |
● |
|
|
|
¤ |
|
● |
● |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
|
2. Verify inventory consistent with sales (in aggregate) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
|
Completeness |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
|
3. Verify adjustments applied based on year-end count |
¤ |
● |
● |
|
¤ |
¤ |
|
¤ |
¤ |
¤ |
● |
|
¤ |
|
|
¤ |
¤ |
¤ |
¤ |
¤ |
¤ |
|
|||||
|
4. Verify inclusion of purchases in inventory |
|
|
|
|
● |
|
|
● |
|
● |
|
|
¤ |
|
|
|
¤ |
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
|
Rights/obligations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
|
5. Verify that all inventory (by SKU) was purchased |
|
|
|
|
● |
|
|
|
|
● |
|
|
¤ |
¤ |
¤ |
|
¤ |
¤ |
|
¤ |
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
|
Valuation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
|
6. Verify application of markdown policy for LCM |
|
● |
● |
|
¤ |
|
¤ |
¤ |
¤ |
¤ |
¤ |
● |
¤ |
|
|
|
● |
● |
|
|
● |
|
|||||
|
7. Verify agreement of inventory costs and invoice costs |
¤ |
|
|
|
● |
|
|
|
|
|
● |
|
|
¤ |
¤ |
|
|
● |
● |
|
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
|
Presentation/disclosure |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
|
8. Verify agreement of detail records with GL balances |
|
|
|
|
|
● |
|
|
¤ |
|
● |
● |
|
¤ |
¤ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
|
Propagation of adjustments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
|
Note need to propagate adjustments to stores 1 and 2. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
● |
|
¤ |
¤ |
¤ |
|
|
● |
|
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
1 A dot (●) in a cell denotes a reasonable interpretation of the numerical outcomes from execution of audit procedures for that audit objective. A circle with a dot (¤) denotes a marginal interpretation of the results. A blank cell denotes inadequate, erroneous, or missing interpretations of the results.
TABLE 6 Identification of Anomalous Conditions and Their Investigation1 |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
Team |
|
Individual
Participant |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Condition |
1 |
2 |
3 |
|
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
9 |
10 |
11 |
12 |
13 |
14 |
15 |
16 |
17 |
|
|||||
|
Existence |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
|
1. Absence of payments for 30% of inventory |
|
● |
|
|
|
¤ |
|
● |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
|
2. Paid-for inventory enabling only 70% of sales in the GL |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
|
Potential explanations: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
|
a. Payments due but not paid |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
● |
● |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
|
b. Payments in dispute |
|
|
● |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
|
c. Payments miscoded |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
|
d. Payments non-existent but sales inflated |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
|
Completeness |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
|
SKUs of early purchases missing from inventory |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
● |
|
● |
● |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
|
Potential explanation: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
|
Early, sold-out SKUs archived off-line |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
¤ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
|
Rights/obligations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
|
Insufficient data to verify purchases for inventory |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
|
Potential investigation: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
|
Get access to all sales to match to purchases |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
|
Valuation |
No condition to investigate |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
|
Presentation/disclosure |
No condition to investigate |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
|
Propagation of adjustments |
No condition to investigate |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
1 A dot (●) in a cell denotes the participant offering a reasonable identification of conditions warranting further investigation or a potential explanation of an anomalous condition to be investigated. A circle with a dot (¤) denotes a marginal identification or explanation. A blank cell denotes inadequate, erroneous, or missing identifications or explanations.
TABLE 7 Performance Lapses By Participant1 |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
Team |
|
Individual
Participant |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Performance Lapse |
1 |
2 |
3 |
|
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
9 |
10 |
11 |
12 |
13 |
14 |
15 |
16 |
17 |
|
|||||
|
Audit objective |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
1 |
|
|
|||||
|
1. Audit objective not phrased in terms of a management assertion |
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
|
2. Audit objective insufficient to develop audit procedures |
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
|
3. Audit objective incomplete or not stated convincingly |
3 |
3 |
3 |
|
1 |
4 |
|
|
2 |
4 |
1 |
|
2 |
1 |
1 |
2 |
2 |
|
|
2 |
|
|
|||||
|
4. Audit objective not significantly relevant to the application |
4 |
1 |
4 |
|
|
1 |
5 |
|
|
4 |
|
||||||||||||||||