Standards for Biology major - level
14
Draft version developed by
Georgia State University and Georgia Perimeter College, August 2002
Barbara
R. Baumstark, Georgia State University
Therese
M. Poole, Georgia State University
Virginia
Michelich, Georgia Perimeter College
Sheryl
Shanholtzer, Georgia Perimeter
College
In
recent years, the field of biology has entered a state of unprecedented
growth and opportunity. The
development of new technology has enabled biologists to ask fundamental
questions that appeared insoluble a few years ago. Because of the rapid
accumulation of new information, the knowledge base available to the
student of biology is constantly changing.
Those seeking to develop standards for the biological sciences
must build a set of criteria that encompasses the theoretical framework
and scientific information essential to the modern biologist, while
at the same time maintaining the flexibility to accommodate and evaluate
new hypotheses as they arise.
The
successful identification of learning outcomes that apply to all students
in the biological sciences will ensure that these students possess the
knowledge and the skills necessary to maintain a high level of scientific
literacy throughout their lives. The
following three steps are each essential for this to occur.
1. Definition of Standards
a. Scientific
process - at what level should students be familiar with the hypotheses,
experimental techniques and data analysis that have formed the foundation
supporting currently accepted scientific principles?
b. Content
-what information base are students expected to accumulate during the
course of their education?
c. Application
- what skills do students need to develop in order to use and extend
their accumulated information base throughout their lives?
2. Implementation
strategies
a.
How are the standards being addressed through the current curriculum?
b.
What new courses or initiatives are needed to meet the standards?
3. Assessment
procedures
a.
What tools are used to evaluate the success of implementation
strategies?
b.
How will the results of the evaluation process be interpreted?
1. Definition of Standards. The
goal of any set of standards should be to ensure that students possess
a defined core of information coupled with the skills to use that information
as well as the expertise to evaluate its validity. Students will be equipped with the ability
to use and extend their scientific knowledge base throughout their lives
if that knowledge base is presented in a context that stresses:
1. Scientific inquiry, reasoning and communication
2. History of biology and its past and present
impact on society
3. Information content in biology
Like the organisms that are the subjects of biological study,
disciplines in biology can be viewed as continuously evolving entities
that rely on the mutual interaction of many different components.
At the root of every scientific discipline, including biology,
is an acknowledgement of the importance of scientific
inquiry. Scientific inquiry
forms the support structure responsible for the development of each
discipline. The information obtained from scientific inquiry,
the generation of new principles to explain this information, and the
communication of the results to others strengthens the entire scientific
process, thereby fueling further inquiry.
The
ability to convey the true nature of scientific inquiry is greatly enhanced
by an understanding of the historical and social contexts that provide
the settings for scientific discovery.
A thorough background in the history
and nature of science, and the ways that science
and technology impact human society, provides students with the
necessary perspective to critically evaluate the scientific basis for
debates involving developments in the biological sciences.
In order to appreciate the quantitative aspects of biology, it
is essential that the curriculum apply the principles of mathematics,
chemistry and physics to the theoretical foundations of biological processes. This integration of biology with other related
disciplines is a crucial element for the mastery of biology.
Students should be informed of the personal and societal impact of developments in biology. The developments interface with many aspects
of human life, such as cloning and the potential for genetic testing
and gene therapy, human health and emerging infectious diseases, and
environmental concerns.
Mastery
of scientific concepts requires a minimal facility with basic scientific
vocabulary. Students who cannot
define a “ribosome’” for instance, will be unable to comprehend the
process of protein synthesis. Therefore,
it is essential that students exhibit a familiarity with currently accepted
hypotheses, observations, and other material that make up the information content in biology.
However, just as the commitment of vocabulary lists to memory
does not provide one with mastery of a foreign language, so memorization
of terminology outside an appropriate scientific context will not endow
students with a lasting proficiency in the biological sciences.
To obtain fluency in biology, students must continuously reinforce
their skills by applying their newly achieved knowledge to the understanding
of hypotheses and the interpretation of experimental observations.
They must also be given the opportunity for hands-on participation
in the research process. This
will give them an appreciation for the events that lead to the accumulation
of scientific knowledge. Furthermore,
it will provide them with the ability to evaluate the strengths and
limitations of scientific evidence that is used to support new hypotheses
that may be proposed in the future.
2. Implementation. Two
elements are vital to the successful implementation of undergraduate
standards.
1. Expectations for level 13-16 must build on
the foundations established in K-12.
2. Facility
in biology must be accompanied by an understanding of processes traditionally
assigned to other disciplines, including mathematics, chemistry and
physics.
3. Assessment. In its simplest form, assessment involves
an evaluation of instructional outcomes; that is, it determines the
degree to which the standards have been met.
Deficiencies in reaching the goals set by the standards committee
promote a reevaluation of many aspects of the standards process, raising
the following questions.