Learning
objective |
Activity |
Resources |
In class Tuesday September 11 |
|
| Thrive
in virtual environments |
Update
learningProgress.htm
|
Directions
for editing and publishing web pages |
| Develop
assurance objectives for risks of information systems |
Consider
PCAOB's Auditing Standard 5 (AS5), which superseded AS2
- How do AS2 and
AS5 differ?
- What prompted
the changes?
|
Auditing
Standard No. 5. At the site,
select Auditing Standard No. 5. |
Represent
business processes graphically and make inferences from graphical representations
as a means to understand business situations sufficient to:
- Develop assurance
objectives for risks of information systems
|
Represent
business processes graphically
- Consider a business
process diagram (BPD) for the Warranty Call Center case. Not all
the process elements were explicitly stated.
- Where do they
come from?
- The business
situation, e.g., narratives or conversations
- Data definitions
- The data
- Other
materials, if any
- Common
knowledge about the situation or processes
- Inferences
about processes supporting the above
- From the potential
process elements identified above, which ones do you include? Include
ones that:
- Pertain
to the objectives of the audit or analysis that will be conducted
through querying
- Support
querying nuances
- If specified,
categorize risks as "included" or "not included"
- Consider the Wireless
Billing case.
- What potential
process elements emerge from each of the sources?
- Which ones
to you include in the BPD and why?
|
Warranty
Call Center case
- Business
situation
- Database
- BPD
Wireless Billing
case
- Business
situation
- Database
Business process
modeling
- Introduction
to BPMN
- Business
Process Modeling Notation Version 1.0 May 3, 2004 (2.6MB)
- Flowcharting in
Excel.
In Excel 2007, the drawing symbols are available from the Insert tab
(to the right of the Home tab) under Shapes.
|
Wireless
Billing case
- Answer practice
questions.
- Based on the question
results, what do you need to do to prepare for next week's quiz?
|
Wireless
Billing case
- Business
situation
- Database
|
Consider
the implications of graphical representations of business processes
- Why do we need
yet another format for representing business processes?
- How is BPMN similar
to/different from earlier graphical notations such as flowcharting and
data flow diagramming? What prompted its creation?
- Of the software
that is readily available for preparing BPMN representations, which
should we use? Excel?
Visio? Something else?
- Evaluating internal
control (Krishnan et al. 2005)
- Could graphical
representations facilitate identifying:
- Key controls?
pp. 309-310
- Effective
and efficient sets of key controls? pp. 310
- Why does the
span of a control matter? pp. 310-312
- Why is identifying
effective and efficient sets of key controls such a hard problem?
Why is there such variability in experienced auditors' selection
of key control sets? pp. 320-323
- How could
auditors use an automated means of modeling controls? p. 320-323
|
- Introduction
to BPMN
- Business
Process Modeling Notation Version 1.0 May 3, 2004 (2.6MB)
- Krishnan
et al. 2005. On data reliability assessment in accounting information
systems. Information Systems Research 16(3): 307-326
|
| |
- Represent business
processes as a means to understand business situations sufficient to:
- Develop assurance
objectives for risks of information systems
- Implement assurance
procedures with software tools
- Communicate assurance
results
|
- Complete
Wireless Billing case report
- Analyze the
wireless billing situation to complete this report,
which includes a link to a version of the database that would contain
your queries, to:
- Detect
errors, if any, in the billing
- Identify
less expensive calling configurations, if they exist
- In your GSU
web space, publish:
- The analysis
with the filename:
05-wirelessAnalysis.htm
- The database
containing your queries with the filename:
05-wirelessQueries.mdb
Before publishing the database, compact it so that it takes
less disk space. A smaller file will load faster too! Verify
that your files can be viewed through the link on the learning
progress page.
If your
database link got corrupted, e.g., through saving 05-wirelessAnalysis.htm
across folders, remove all the path for the link except the
filename 05-wirelessQueries.mdb: In Word, highlight
the name of the link | Insert | Hyperlink | [edit the path].
The report
is worth half the points for the Wireless Billing case.
- Prepare to answer
questions about the case in next week's quiz. By case, ways to practice
querying and making inferences are:
- Car maker/Car
dealer case
- Perform
the querying for the case. Repeat the querying until you can
query the database without referring to the explanations in
the "Query creation" links.
- Answer
the questions in uLearn about the case. Think about the structure
and logic of the questions until you can answer them independently.
Imagine similar questions in the context of the Warranty Call
Center case. The question structure and logic are important
because the Warranty Call Center case questions have similar
structure and logic.
- Warranty Call
Center case
- Develop
query objectives
- Query
the database to satisfy the query objectives.
For help with query objectives and query sequences, see the
uLearn quiz Warranty Call Center practice. A database with queries
is available in a discussion post.
- Wireless Billing
case
- Imagine
analogs in the Wireless Billing situation to the questions in
the Car maker/Car dealer and Warranty Call Center cases
|
Wireless
Billing case
- Business
situation
- Database
|
| Develop
assurance objectives for risks of information systems |
Consider
the difference between auditors having a choice about evaluating internal
control (pre-SOX) and being required to evaluate internal control (post-SOX)
- What prompted
the shift? Was the shift an over reaction to events in 2002 such as
Enron and WorldCom?
- How does information
technology change the nature of internal control compared to internal
control based on manual procedures?
- How does an auditor
go from identifying a potentially relevant internal control to placing
audit reliance on it? Hint: Remember the examples in Auditing Standard
No. 2.
- How do you test
internal controls in highly automated situations? Example
of change control (begin at "we've identified our key controls".
- How do auditors
know they have tested the right "key controls"? (cf. Krishnan
et al. 2005)
|
- Pre-SOX internal
control summary
- Post-SOX
- Hunton pp.
1-18
- PCAOB site:
- Auditing
Standard No. 2
- Policy
Statement Regarding Implemen-tation of Auditing Standard No.
2
- Auditing
Standard No. 5
- Example
of change control
- Krishnan
et al. 2005. On data reliability assessment in accounting information
systems. Information Systems Research 16(3): 307-326
|
| Develop
assurance objectives for risks of financial accounting systems |
Prepare
questions about the Eticket case |
- Eticket
situation
- Auditing standards:
- Pre-SOX: AU326
- Post-SOX:
SAS 106
- Krishnan
et al. 2005. On data reliability assessment in accounting information
systems. Information Systems Research 16(3): 307-326
|